Anonymous ID: 5e985b Oct. 21, 2020, 1:28 p.m. No.11195146   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>5273

>>11194880

>VIEWED the emails…

 

She said they have VIEWED the emails. Not possessed. Which means they had a meeting with Rudy, he showed them the material, so they could report that it is real and authentic.

 

Without this authentication process, OAN would be risking a slander lawsuit by the Bidens. Now that they know the material is real, they can report on its existence.

 

This is what we call "Journalism." It's an ancient practice that once existed in the free lands, before the coming of the Swamp.

Anonymous ID: 5e985b Oct. 21, 2020, 1:36 p.m. No.11195273   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>5356

>>11195146

Does anybody remember when the Washington Post staff tricked that internet blog into reporting all kinds of horrible LIES and exaggerations about Redskins' owner Dan Snyder?

 

Remember how the WaPo staff did it? They assured the [idiot] bloggers that they had all of the evidence, and were going to publish later that week?

 

The bloggers then prematurely published the UNVERIFIED reports, staking EVERYTHING on the integrity of the reports given to them by their "friends" at the WaPo? (The bloggers' report claimed that the WaPo had "Epstein-esque" evidence against Snyder.)

 

Net result was enormous hype in anticipation of the WaPo story… which ended up being a total dud.

 

All the bloggers had to do was request an in-person interview with the WaPo staff, to view the material. Once they verified its existence, then they could publish with confidence that they would be protected from a lawsuit.

 

They did NOT do this. And now, they are being sued for $10 MILLION, and are in a fuckload of trouble.

 

This is the difference between real journalists at OAN, and a shitty internet blog run by amateurs.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/07/sports/dan-snyder-washington-nfl-defamation-lawsuit.html