Have to ask, Q: you know that Oswalk tweet was shopped to reflect C.P.P..
Though it is sometimes necessary to display our enemies in their true form through manipulation etc., you know people sharing that when it can be debunked isn't the best move.
I'd still prefer to know why Q has posted the Oswalkd pic with C.P.P. once again, knowing it is a shop.
There's so much more evidence. Why set people up to be proven liars, effectively?
Unless, of course, the pic IS originally with the C.P.P. initiative.
Could be with you until…
>Disbelievers forward it to their frens to ridicule
>Someone starts digging to prove how "stupid" it is
>And discovers some truth
…that crucial middle step of investigating for themselves: most people are doing to see it disproven and NEVER touch the subject again.
Not only that, they will come forward with a smug attitude and denunciation toward anything of this kind in the future.
Yes, they can eventually be disproven, but…as with now, say people weren't "convinced" by Nov. 3rd, (((they))) would win anyway–(((they))) would no longer need to fear the few who investigated for themselves instead of being fed the facts, as they now are "fed" the "facts".
[CNN] et al.
What trash that became from the thought it originated from…
(Most will see something immediately disproven within the comments and never think of it again because SOMETHING new will come out, and unless WE do OUR job, they will never see the underlying thread; they will become the overlying masses)