D5 Avalanche incoming!
https://you$tu.be/Dp$joeLS$Km4w (Delete the $ characters.)
According to him, if they lie, if they try to hide stuff, MORE COMES OUT!
What do you think? Did they prepare one for KH?
Mr. Lude said there could be as many as 100 hard drives by the time we're done.
https://y$outu.be/WzL$KvN-$h23Y (Delete the $ characters.)
( Time stamps on the images won't match. I grabbed those screen shots from a commentary video that included this video: https://yout$u.be/5j$dI0$RdMt$SM I thought that reporter did a good job tying things together, actually. )
"They" in this case is said to be the Chinese billionaires. They figured out what the Bidens' scam was and that they could be next one knocked off.
What I gather from what was presented is that all of this is about eliminating competition quite literally, whether by killing off owners of corporations or via the Green New Deal which would make it so that countries cannot produce. The Bidens have stakes in energy companies. Among other things, they want to own the entire industry. Remember, climate agreements have never sought to control CHINA – only everyone else. Somehow, these agreements were written to allow China to keep doing what they're doing, in spite of the perpetual cloud over Beijing. Under the climate agreements, it will become almost impossible for the rest of the world to produce, includnig the US. Instant monopoly for China and anyone else favored in these deals.
Here are a couple other interesting videos from Mr. Lude.
https://yo$utu.be/ax$Osa3z$yQes
https://youtu.b$e/J8$11N4$PPKt$E
(Again, delete the $ characters.)
More about Mr. Lude can be found here: https://gn$ews$.org/ (Delete the $ characters.)
Also in https://you$tu.be/a$xOsa3zy$Qes (already posted)
Do you want to know why so many people are fooled about the leftist agenda? Why won't the NYT and WSJ talk about these things? The CCP owns the media behind the scenes, that's why. People thought they were so smart, reading those science magazines. But those were controlled, too, as we can see here. And this would explain how that bogus article that had to be retracted ended up in The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine. The numbers in a study can usually manipulated to come up with just about any conclusion desired. Have you ever read an abstract of a study and then the full article and wondered how they wrote the abstract based on the the information presented in the article? Yeah, me, too. Ironically, the most notable case of this occurred when I dug into the book "The China Study." Consider also their potential influence on textbook companies that supply the books for K-12 as well as colleges. Do you think maybe that is why teachers are among the most triggered leftists out there?
> >People thought they were so smart, reading those science magazines. But those were controlled, too
>Anons already knew this and have been getting gaslit by [mockingbird] idiots for years…
Remember, the goal is to get those who were gas-lit to understand that. We're supposed to help as many people as possible to understand this. So it bears repeating.