Anonymous ID: d0f9cf Oct. 22, 2020, 6:38 a.m. No.11210155   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0176

All of the shills on here whining are so fucking stupid.

 

Of ALL the days for "real" anons to whine and lament, it wouldn't be today. Not with all of the anticipation of tonight. (That's how we know you are all shills.)

 

This is what Q means when he calls the shills STUPID.

Anonymous ID: d0f9cf Oct. 22, 2020, 6:53 a.m. No.11210318   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0340

>>11210296

That's a bridge too far.

 

All of the hard evidence points to Hunter. There is certainly evidence against Joe, but he wouldn't be indicted before Hunter.

 

Unless Hunter has flipped….

Anonymous ID: d0f9cf Oct. 22, 2020, 6:59 a.m. No.11210395   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11210340

It's a fantastic plot twist, and very much plausible.

 

But I don't think Joe getting indicted [by Trump's government] hours before the final Presidential debate is the optics we are going for. (Too easy to dispel as partisan and authoritarian, given the timing.)

 

I would also think they would cancel the debate, and blame Trump's DOJ.

 

But Hunter being indicted is a very different bird. Joe would still be expected to debate, and it would be impossible to ignore the breaking news topic.

 

It would be a much more damning spectre looming in the background, I think.