Anonymous ID: 44437d Oct. 22, 2020, 11:39 a.m. No.11215292   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5490

frebe !!!OTYzYTRiMGU3MmQ2 10/22/20 (Thu) 14:36:32 005930 No.38329

>>38327

FJ and BVs could be much more actively involved in this op that it at first appears.

 

You mean like you do? Deleting posts you dont like so that others cannot learn truth? Yeah we already live in that world. We dont need a copy of it here as well.

Anonymous ID: 44437d Oct. 22, 2020, 11:41 a.m. No.11215376   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5414

>>11215313

>Not true.

 

Yes true. Nothing would change. Perhaps because you are a stupid house nigger for the cbts crew as well as the wr crew and the abcu crew, you dont have any ideas on what reality is. However adding a trip wont change anything. There already was a way to track, and here we are. Fucking idiot.

Anonymous ID: 44437d Oct. 22, 2020, 11:43 a.m. No.11215413   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>11215401

>TODAY IS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT DAYS IN HUMAN HISTORY

 

>Q just indicated this is fromSTUPIDITYnot from compromiseโ€ฆ

 

>BAKERS

 

>Get your shit together or get out of the wayโ€ฆ

 

>Because of yourSTUPIDITYyou have allowed a vulnerability to be exploitedโ€ฆ

Cause THIS does not add to the stupidity at all!

Anonymous ID: 44437d Oct. 22, 2020, 11:44 a.m. No.11215432   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>11215414

!!FckX0TjqqY 10/22/20 (Thu) 14:40:10 f942c7 No.38337

 

>>38331

 

>>>/qresearch/11215255

 

Not true.

 

If a procedure was put in place to review past bakes, and determine which bakers are trustworthy, then BO could enable tripcodes and those bakers could use tripcodes.

 

Then people would know that the baker of a certain bread was done by a baker with a track record of trustworthiness.

 

It is perfectly feasible to implement (from a technical standpoint).

 

The social aspect, determining who/how to trust, is a separate issue that anons seem to have a lot of difficulty with.

 

They are however accurate.

Anonymous ID: 44437d Oct. 22, 2020, 12:14 p.m. No.11216162   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6176

>>11216144

>you fuckers aint figured it out yet, huh?

 

><ban dont work no more.

I know the banning wount work. I know that the reality is that really there is nothing to be done. I was however answering a question and will continue to answer it in that manner.

Anonymous ID: 44437d Oct. 22, 2020, 12:31 p.m. No.11216456   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6527

>>11216412

>Yup, the autists left the board when it became a chat room. Anon spends most time on twitter and only come here to see Q posts. The past two weeks or so has been a shit show.

 

All autists havent left. That statement right there is wrong. Which makes the rest purely an attempt to influence others. Dont give a single shit who you believe you are. You are nothing to me. So fuck off with your attempts to use confusion to try and direct anons.