It looks like I have about 20 minutes left of the debate and there's been no mention of Q at all.
>I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races, -that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will for ever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race. I say upon this occasion I do not perceive that because the white man is to have the superior position the negro should be denied everything. I do not understand that because I do not want a negro woman for a slave I must necessarily want her for a wife. My understanding is that I can just let her alone. I am now in my fiftieth year, and I certainly never have had a black woman for either a slave or a wife.
https://thekeep.eiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1060&context=eiu_bulletin
>isnt one board attacking another some kind of imageboard treason?
you're just new
/leftypol/ fucks with us literally all of the time.
You guys might like this thread about the origins of humanity (or at least early human history).
https://archive.vn/i7Ol6
>Bible.com
Read that thread and you'll find out why we make fun of you can call you a brainlet.
Don't get me wrong, plenty of us recognize the importance of the bible, but until you learn that the old testament is told from a very wildly different perspective from the new testament, you're just going to be another evangelical drone.
Is Matt going to talk about what prompted him to adopt his "son"?