Anonymous ID: dbbe87 Oct. 23, 2020, 8:13 p.m. No.11247465   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11247195 pb

>>11247100 pb

some of them were getting dropped into the hands of human trafffickers

there was a congressman that had a report on it.

 

cant find it at the moment but I think the congressman was from Ohio

Anonymous ID: dbbe87 Oct. 23, 2020, 8:22 p.m. No.11247585   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7641 >>7734 >>7745 >>7942 >>8086 >>8140

Anons, ran out of steam so dumping for any night shift diggers

WHO BUILT THE CAGES JOE?

Breitbart article had the cages built in 2014. The location they were referring to was the Ursula detention center.

 

They built cages,” Trump said, pointing to Biden. “They used to say I built the cages and then they had a picture in a certain newspaper and it was a picture of these horrible cages, and they said ‘Look at these cages. President Trump built them.’ And then it was determined they were built in 2014. That was him.”

 

Photos provided by Custom and Border Protection to reporter on tour of Ursala detention facility in McAllen, Texas. Reporters were not allowed to take their own photos.

 

Ursula is the colloquial name for the Central Processing Center, the largest U.S. Customs and Border Protection detention center for undocumented immigrants. The facility is a retrofitted warehouse that can hold more than 1,000 people.[1] It was opened in 2014 on W. Ursula Avenue in McAllen, Texas. In June 2018, it gained notoriety for the practice of keeping children in large cages made of chain-link fencing.

 

Some digging for government contracts for Ursula Mccallen 2014 and there's a contract awarded to

MCC CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION

5275 DTC PKY

ENGLEWOOD, CO 80111

Congressional District: CO-CO00

UNITED STATES

 

Description

 

IGF::OT::IGF MCALLEN TEMPORARY HOLDING FACILITY BUILD-OUT, TO INCLUDE FENCING AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM UPGRADE. MCALLEN, TX

 

https://www.usaspending.gov/award/CONT_AWD_GSP0714UK5016_4740_GS07P03HHD0162_4740

Anonymous ID: dbbe87 Oct. 23, 2020, 8:27 p.m. No.11247641   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7734 >>7745 >>7822 >>7865 >>7942 >>8086 >>8140

>>11247585

>>11247585

MCC defrauding the US Gov

with the Chinks?

Fareast Construction

come on man

 

there was a DOJ case where MCC Construction was tied to a Chinese construction company namedFar East Construction Corporation

Michelle Cho was thrown in jail for fraud

 

https://gtpac.org/2016/11/22/construction-company-officer-pleads-guilty-to-8a-fraud/

 

Construction company officer pleads guilty to 8(a) fraud

 

November 22, 2016 By Andrew Smith

 

As part of a plea deal with the U.S. Dept. of Justice, Michelle Cho, an officer of Far East Construction Corporation (Far East) and other construction companies,has agreed to forfeit $169,166 and pay a criminal fine in the amount of $35,000.

 

Justice Dept. seal - CopyAccording to court documents filed as part of the plea, Cho utilized two straw companies, including Far East, to conspire with MCC Construction Company (MCC) and others to defraud the SBA. Cho’s two companies were eligible to receive federal government contracts set asides for small, disadvantaged businesses. Cho and MCC understood that MCC would, illegally, perform all of the work on these contracts. In so doing, MCC was able to win 27 government contracts worth over $70 million from 2008 to 2011. The scope and duration of the scheme resulted in a significant number of opportunities lost to legitimate small and disadvantaged businesses.

 

Cho, 45, of Downers Grove, Illinois, was charged on October 12, 2016 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia with one count of conspiring to commit wire fraud. She waived the requirement of being charged by way of federal indictment, agreed to the filing of the information and accepted responsibility for her criminal conduct.

 

Court documents show that Cho and MCC violated the provisions of the SBA 8(a) program, which is designed to award contracts to businesses that are owned by “one or more socially and economically disadvantaged individuals.” To qualify for the 8(a) program, a business must be at least 51 percent owned and controlled by a U.S. citizen (or citizens) of good character who meets the SBA’s definition of socially and economically disadvantaged. The firm must also be a small business (as defined by the SBA) and show a reasonable potential for success. Participants in the 8(a) program are subject to regulatory and contractual limits. Also, under the program, the disadvantaged business is required to perform a certain percentage of the work. For the types of contracts under investigation here, the SBA 8(a)-certified companies were required to perform 15 percent or more of the work with its own employees.

 

Court documents also state Cho conspired with MCC and others for MCC to exercise impermissible control over Far East, to obstruct a U.S. Government Agency proceeding, and to reach an agreement whereby MCC would provide all labor, equipment, materials, safety, and supervision and, in return, receive 97 percent of the contract task order amount. This agreement by its terms meant that Cho’s company would violate SBA rules and regulations and would collect a 3 percent fee for allowing its small business status to be used.

 

Earlier this year, MCC pleaded guilty to conspiring to commit fraud on the United States by illegally obtaining government contractsthat were intended for small, disadvantaged businesses and agreed to pay $1,769,924 in criminal penalties and forfeiture. In June, Thomas Harper, another former officer and owner of MCC, pleaded guilty to conspiring to obstruct proceedings before a department or agency. In August, Walter Crummy, another former officer and owner of MCC, pleaded guilty to conspiring to commit wire fraud.

Anonymous ID: dbbe87 Oct. 23, 2020, 8:41 p.m. No.11247822   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11247641

sidetrack

Found a blurb about the Ursula Warehouse being involved in a Dept of Labor investigation when it was being run by Gmark. this was pre detention center days. investigation was on behalf of "it's workers." ahem illegals my guess

 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–65,432] Gmark Industries, McAllen, TX; Notice of Termination of Investigation Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 27, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of the workers of Gmark Industries, McAllen, Texas. The petitioner requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of March 2009. Richard Church, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E9–8931 Filed 4–17–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P

 

 

NEWSCLIPS

 

Tweet

Share

Share

Email

 

Print

 

Gmark assets forwarded to auctioneer

 

MCALLEN, TEXAS — Gmark Industries Inc. has terminated operations in McAllen and is slated to have its assets auctioned.

 

“They closed down about six weeks ago,” a neighbor said on April 1.

 

Industry veteran Greg Botner and two partners bought the 75,000-square-foot McAllen plant in April 2007. Previously, the facility was part of the now-defunct Titan Plastics Group Corp.

 

The auctioneer's 19-page Gmark offering lists 43 injection molding machines of 44-551 tons, including Van Dorn, Nissei, Milacron, Toshiba, Roboshot, Sumitomo and Husky models from 1984-2002. Other equipment includes dryers, temperature controllers, granulators, water chillers, electrical-discharge machines, machining centers and forklifts.

 

Gmark's creditor retained Branford Industrial Group LLC of Branford, Conn., to conduct the April 16 auction on location and through a webcast. Inspections are scheduled for April 15.

 

Myers to reorganize materials group