No, per Q's drops, it's about how to make intel gathered evidence admissible in a court of law
Judge Judy wouldn'e even admit this 8chan "evidence" for a $200 dog shit lawn damage civil matter. The evidence is simply lacking, and more so, it's far from being untainted. Think what you want. This is the reality.
Since Pizzagate resulted in the raw administration of justice, I've no doubt that Pizzagate 2.0 will be just as successful.
I'm highly impressed with your facts and logic shill. Per Q drops, how do you make intel admissible in court? Well, not this way, and I've yet to see incriminating evidence.
Then Obama, Hillary, and friends can claim that they cannot receive a fair trial due to Q, 8chan, and conspiracy theories and memes spread on social media.
That's just more wishful thinking that may or may not materialize.
Here. And there. But I've been advocating martial law for a year now, so I'm not enthralled with this wisdom of holding military tribunals.
Yes, so the FBI can scrub evidence.