but here ’ s the real kicker, the unarmed invader is far more dangerous to our people than the armed invader. yes, though not for an official policy made. the best time for attack was yesterday, the second best time is now the birthrates must eventually be addressed, at all costs even if all invaders are deported tomorrow and all traitors are dealt with as they truly deserve, we are still living on borrowed time. no. what nations do we have to conserve? londinium, the very heart of the british isles.

if they flee we will follow them, if they hide we will find them, if they try to shield themselves behind the state we will break through and reach them. this stripping of wealth and prosperity in order to feed and develop our cultural competitors is an act of civilization terrorism resulting in the reduction in development and living conditions of our own people for the benefit of those that hate us. won ’ t your attack result in calls for the removal of gun rights in the new zealand? i have read the writings of dylan roof and many others, but only really took true inspiration from knight justiciar breivik. by the definition, then yes. we could be hurt! ” for them the time will never come.

>they will soon find out how wrong they truly are.