radical, explosive action is the only desired, and required, response to an attempted genocide. why did you choose this time to attack? household flour, a method of dispersion and an ignition source.a ballpeen hammer and a wooden shield.gas, fire, vehicular attacks, plane attacks, any means were available. nor should you, why should you have peace when your other brothers in europe face certain war? the hagia sophia will be free of minarets and constantinople will be rightfully christian owned once more. ignore their demise?

and what can we do to stop it? survival was a better alternative to death in order to further spread my ideals by media coverage and to deplete resources from the state by my own imprisonment. make your plans, get training, form alliances, get equipped and then act. also, relying on this time period for our victory holds a second major disadvantage, that being vulnerability to foreign invasion, most likely from the east, specifically china; turkey; india or some combination of the three. to incite violence, retaliation and further divide between the european people and the invaders currently occupying european soil. for many years i had been hearing and reading of the invasion of france by non-whites, many of these rumours and stories i believed to be exaggerations, created to push a political narrative.

>do not suffer under the delusion of an effortless, riskless democratic victory.