>>11252811

>is this legit?

If by legit do you mean is there such a place? Yes. However there are MANY such places, and that one, like all of the others, will only be a parasite on our backs. Just like WR and abcu and qrb, they just aggregate what is produced here. Those who are there only want a controlled release of the news.

While I do not agree with the specific direction that it seems we hare are pointed, in general it seems to be close enough. As we develop moar bakers, things will get worked out, just as they did before.

placed some in yes, can't hurt-with a caveat below.

It's all about wut the current baker on duty does, if that shit continues I will not post in the active gen thread-the others will do it though so aware of that.

The lackey is still placing all the blame on /comms as usual.

Isnt this the same reasoning as a spouse abuser uses? "If you werent so stupid, I wouldnt have to give you black eyes honey"

>>11253258

> I know I’m not alone in feeling this.

Consensus building, gotta love it.

>>11253276

>The baker decides what goes in the notables for the bread they bake, period.

Yes and it is a balancing act to ensure that there is no blockage of information while at the same time, not making a wall of text as notable. This poster is not wrong. I suspect you all know it and I get why it triggers you (not intended to be a negative, triggers arent bad things)

>>11253334

>it's still just a "greatest hits" compilation.

>the album's always right there.

Yes, point being to not loose the music due to the takes of the band trashing the place.

>>11253343

This to me is NOTABLE

>>11253265

Why dont you ask for handoff?