>>11255063 (lb)
I am not a newfag.
When it comes to the sexualization of children, I will never back down.
I know what you mean about shill tactics.
But it's also about keeping our work environment clean.
I have dug a lot and have had some success with it.
I would love to just keep working.
But as long as there are sexualized images of children here, I will fight against it and stop digging.
That this crap stops here is the job of BO, CM and Q.
If they don't do their job, we can't do ours.
>>11255136 (lb)
The definition you ask for is given by our laws.
Laws regulate the coexistence of all people in a community, called a state.
Laws are rules that we have given ourselves (more or less) to regulate our living together.
These laws are clear in their definition of a child.
If you don't know this then read it.
But you are overlooking something.
We are no longer just a little rat-shop in which a few fags hang around.
We have become a worldwide movement.
Every day a lot of people come here for the first time.
We are the news now - remember?
8kun is becoming more and more mainstream.
This must be the case so that more and more people wake up.
So it is no longer just about digging.
It is also about showing what values we stand for.
If we allow the sexualized representation of obvious children here, how are we going to argue that we are against the sexualization of children?
This contradicts itself and this contradiction is obvious.
We lose our credibility.
In addition, of course, the sexualized depiction of obvious children is brainwashing.
brainwashing that is supposed to make us become accustomed to seeing children as sexual objects.
Sometimes things are just wrong Anon.
Children are the most valuable we have.
If we forget that for just a second, we are not much better than (((they))).
It's not about me as a person, Anon.
It's about what we're fighting for.
When I see pictures of sexualized children here on this board, it is wrong.
If you make too many compromises, then you lose yourself, Anon.
Not only as a person, but also as a community.
If we as a community allow this filth to be tolerated on "our" board, then what are we fighting for?
We betray ourselves, we betray everything we pretend to be fighting for.
Stand your ground!
> that it's become a slide topic
Yes, this risk exists - I completely agree with you.
Nevertheless, we must not make any compromises at this point.
It is about what we stand for.
It is about the core of our movement.
We Anons cannot prevent this filth from becoming a slide.
Only BO, CM and Q can do that.
In my opinion, they simply have to do their job and ban this kind of sexualized depiction of obvious children and the subject is immediately dead.
Ultimately, the Q-Team has to say where the red lines are.
It's also about their credibility and I hope and pray that they make the right decision and act