Anonymous ID: 49a4de Oct. 24, 2020, 3:11 p.m. No.11258432   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8851

>>11258366

>Even the baker removed it from notable:

Baker was right to do. This is one we dont want to be first on. Should it be proven wrong, it is us who will take the hammer blow to the forehead. If it is proven right, we still will have a massive backlash for having it up. JMO but, this baker wont post it or have anything to do with bread that does.

Anonymous ID: 49a4de Oct. 24, 2020, 3:30 p.m. No.11258753   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8766

>>11258749

>It;s too late. The shills have attached themselves to this. They are going to push the CP angle HARD. Then when it shows it's just a hooker, They ignore everything else that comes out next.

 

>I'm done saying anything about it though, because it doesn't seem to matter. Some anons are forever retarded

Yep

Anonymous ID: 49a4de Oct. 24, 2020, 3:37 p.m. No.11258877   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9050

>>11258851

>Just admit being wrong, stfu, and go back to jerk off anime porn.

 

>It was obviously legit to those who understood who was who.

I dont need to admit to anything. I havent said if its fake or not. What I have said is that its radioactive. You fucking idiots who snap when shills and wr tell you too is whats wrong here.