>>11265994

Rudy wouldn't but when it comes to the CCP, I could definitely see some funny business in the form of disinformation since this embarrasses them as well. The big thing for me though is the end result. I don't give one single shit if I or any other sees the content if it doesn't result in an arrest and conviction.

As it stands he is clearly degenerate, clearly there is something to blackmail by the CCP to own Biden but we need to see actual movement and arrests. We are literal weeks away from an election that could cause a civil war, we need law and order now instead of later if there are crimes being committed. No more games.

>>11266107

There are two options:

1) JIDF narrative to continue the victim narrative to be used against this site. In other words, planted material.

2) At the same time, much of the spam is actually verifiably accurate to a large extent so I cannot see a logical reason they would want to incriminate their own actions.

One thing is certain and that is there are/have been bot postings in the breads for a long time now with those things. I personally do not see them as effective as the real anons here already know much of those things anyhow but we don't hang up on it and just research a topic, figure out what we need to, get a new topic to research. As it stands I could see the spammers being either Iran, Israel, China, or the media planting the data to use against the real research here but, frankly, I never have spent much time on that research or bothering with the shills anyhow and usually just auto filter as it isn't worth my time and I prefer a relaxed night shift.

>>11266139

The JQ portion is odd as we have never added those bot posts to our breads before. Is this a new direction you favor?

>>11266179

I am well aware of the narrative but from my own personal research I see them as being broken into two distinct and oppositional sects. One is definitely what you describe but the other is not. I do not hate them by any means and would prefer if research was conducted on issues and brought up when it related to existing issues rather than constant Jew hate which holds no interest for me.

>>11266194

By all means, explain it to me then. This should be entertaining….

>>11266184

Well of course, I come here for a purpose and one of them is not to be bogged down by obvious stupidity which any legitimate anon steers well clear of both in the world and the net. You do realize that the vast majority of us auto filter those such as you, yes? This has been discussed many times over here. But think as you will as I can assure you it will not mean a single thing to me. I have many questions for you/those such as you but unfortunately none of you ever are directly honest so it's a waste of time to ask at this point.

>>11266231

I asked you to explain it, not repeat a daily bot post. Do you have the capacity?

>>11266226

Seriously unattractive. I would think that a guy with his connections and cash would be banging good looking women but all the photos thus far have been some seriously low grade skank level women.

>>11266285

It has been discussed numerous times through the years, I have no source as I only keep archives of everything I post. I know for a fact it was discussed during last night (night shift) so this is not some random occurrence as the discussion between legitimate anons about those such as you takes place often. The only reason I am even responding to you now is I am hoping one of you drops something specific about something I am researching but none of you ever do as your script and patterns are always consistent. For that I give you (truly) credit as you do good work in that regard but if you have been here for even a short period of time you should know by now that those tactics have limited effect on any actual anons.

>>11266329

It's clearly obvious they have somehow taken over the baking to an extent but you are right, it's all getting out anyhow as this board was only ever a research site to take data to move elsewhere which I am positive is happening on a very large level given what I see on my accounts. So people definitely seem to know how to come here, what to ignore, and so on and personal connections/web of friends is proving a very solid means of dissemination as always.

>>11266402

I don't give a single shit about who he fucks as long as there were no crimes. What I care about is the selling of US tech, secrets, positions, and so on to a foreign nation. That is what matters, the rest is just tabloid shit unless a crime takes place. Need to haul his ass in for the information he was privy to and gave to foreign nations, period.

>>11266436

Well we are very much near the end here. If they cheat, which they will, and win then it was all for naught so I will not be pleased if there is no movement beforehand. Of course I support a much more aggressive means to remove poison from society and feel we (the west) have utterly failed by forgetting how well that works but, even still, we are where we are and I hope something real happens soon as I have deep concerns about what will happen if it doesn't

>>11266453

Same. That is all I care about, the removal of the poison.

>>11266502

This has definitely been on my mind of late. I have nothing to prove it with but I have definitely been considering it.

>>11266596

Your post is correct, there is obvious funny business. We have never had the bot posts added before and this baker is completely unapproachable about explaining why which is another very abnormal thing but the moment it is brought up a rush comes in to whoever brings it up. Clear shill coordination.

>>11266593

That is the best way to handle it. Just save the data if the Baker is comp'd, report them immediately, and post it when a non comp'd baker is on.

>>11266682

Chinks won't drop anything unless it benefits the Chinks so I doubt it will be anything that could lead to their guy (Biden) looking bad.