Anonymous ID: f30e6c Oct. 25, 2020, 12:52 p.m. No.11274432   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>11274297

 

You don't have to convince me. I believe it was someone underage in the foot video because of the way they were talking. You'd have to convince a jury, though.

 

If there's more there, and there might well be, we haven't seen it, and I'm not just going to take the word of some Chink, though. I need proof. I don't want to see TOO much, butโ€ฆ something very carefully censored to prove who it was withoutโ€ฆ. you know.