Anonymous ID: fe2662 Oct. 25, 2020, 5:50 p.m. No.11278434   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>11278372

why not, it's a valid dialect.

do you mean slang?

because 'Ebonics' was documented in the 1920s.

sure, if there were an autist who grew up in an Ebonics dialect household ,why wouldn't they speak in the very slight vocal change of Ebonics, which is well documented by linquistics, and causes no confusion to anyone who knows the dialect.

Anonymous ID: fe2662 Oct. 25, 2020, 5:57 p.m. No.11278555   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8589 >>8712 >>8741 >>8804

>>11278344

Ebonics is a well known slight variation in the way that the tenses of verbs are formed when the final silibent sound becomes silent. It's a well known dialect and doesn't indicate anything more than association with those who speak like that. It's not about being 'less than', it's not a different langauge. and anyone who speaks English has no trouble, once the know and love the people who speak with that dialect, in understanding. If they are confused they easily ask for a clairification, and the person with whom they converse will gladly give it.

does a Cockney dialect have trouble in East LA communicating?

 

they figure out that it's a dialect and respect each other.

or they are like you and use it to be a putdown.

(probalby not, people are usually friendly with foreigners).

grow up and live in the real world of adult respect!