nice dubz yourself friend
Having Nightmares of nightmares
>>11280038 (Bakers META) (me)
>>11271869 (Bakers META)
>ALWAYS been the baker's call
funtionally
absolutely correct
when applied in context with actual anons
refusing to handoff to the first offer made is going to lead to friction
if it is done too egregiosly/ too often
itwilllead to continuing splitting of the bread
this is basic commerce law
when a baker on duty offers to another anon the responsibility of the kitchen they are engaging in commerce
they are making an offer
(insert first come/ first serve clause here)
there are 4 moral responses to an offer made in commerce
1.Refusal
-flat refusal of all terms
-this is called refusal of commerce
-you are refusing to engage in legitimately offered commerce
-by refusing commerce as a resolution to the offer you areaccepting the terms of waras a resolution to the offer
2.Ignorance
-ignoring the offer
-I dont know the period (I think it is 30 days or, 2 fortnights) but this is the length of time you have to morally respond to an offer
-if the offer is ignored beyond this point, it is considered refusal of commerce
-and thus, anacceptance of the terms of waras a resolution to the offer
3.Acceptance
-flat acceptance of all terms
-commerce accepted
-offer agreed too
-all parties are now morally responsible to meet all terms of the offer
4.Conditional Acceptance
-commerce accepted under condition
-parties engage in negotiation over conditions
-either negotiations are succesful, and conditions for commerce are agreed too
-or negotiation is unsuccesful, and both parties agree to amicably part ways, or:
-the terms of war are acceptedas a resolution to the offer
In the context of On Duty Baker requesting a handoff
If the baker makes the requestopen, andwithout condition;
Example:
"Baker Seeking Handoff, Kitchen is offered."
Then I dont see how that baker can add conditions to the orriginal offer after any anon has accepted the orriginal terms of commerce -no conditions.
As in the example:
Baker on Duty: "Baker Seeking Handoff, Kitchen is offered."
first anon offer: "Offer Accepted. Handoff Confirmed?"
Baker on Duty: "Let me see your credentials"
This is a breach of commerce, in changing the conditions of the orriginal offer AFTER it has been duly accepted in commerce
NOW
It is, in practice, solely the decision of the on Duty Baker how to engage in commerce
As I am brainstorming;
If On Duty Baker states the condition of baking credential requirement (whatever they decide that is) in the orriginal offer to handoff the kitchen, then that condition is duly made in commerce.
It would then be the anon accepting the offers responsibility to accept that condition, and offer credential
Refuse that condition and engage in war
Ignore that condition and effectively let someone else take the commerce
or
Conditionally accept the offer, and negotiate the terms of credentials.
If negotiation fails, I can see multiple potentials outcomes;
amicable resolution -third party baker accepts all terms of credential requirement, meets the terms, and takes the bake
no amicable resolution -terms not accepted and war chosen as resolution to offer of commerce
But, seriously, I am not even really sure about the morality about refusing the on duty bakers offer with conditions, if the conditions are clearly stated in the original offer?
it seems this would only be moral if the condition of credential requirements ITSELF was considered a breach of commerce in the sphere of /qresearch/ baking
These are my brainstormings on the subject.
Anyone see any faults in my logic?
Care to offer and criticism?
o7
>my issue is with people splitting the bread and not asking for hand off
5:5
I have issue with this as well
even in the most legitimate case
like every anon in the bread is literally begging anyone to e-bake another bread
in that instance I still think it would be a good idea for the baker planning to split the bread toat the very leastmake an offer to the current on duty baker
failing resolution here
and given anons demanding
move your request to the anons demanding
tag them and ask for confirmed handoff
and then document it all
although I do see a problem with this
I watched some seriously low shit anytime animebaker bakes
people shit all over that baker like its a straight white male with a white wife and a family of blond haired blue eyes kids or something
I dont get it
the anti-anime REEEEEEing has gotten so thick I have seen what I think are anons split the bread without ever asking for a handoff
just because of cartoons
especially dishonorable when you consider animebaker will handoff to literally any anon
all you have to do is ask.
and now I am wall-of-text effort posting again
/for shame/
o7
notes looking good bakes!
>You Bring up some really good points about avoiding Splits.
thank you anon
I try to do so with humor
-kek
o7
>filter
help with bread title, bakes?
or pickup the kitch next bread?
( I am down for both :D )
o7
gnight friend
kek
5:5
>you want the kitchen
sounded like an offer bakes
if your offering I am down to take :)
will be here at the top
great bakes, btw