>>11280980 lb
Keep swinging on the spiral, anon.
I also don't understand the seeming confusion that arose after that drop by Q.
I think Q meant to say "There are no Qanons." Q didn't though… so I'm just confused.
No, again, it was posted earlier.
None of this would have happened if we weren't first seasoned on /pol/.
Quit being a maroon and policing culture here. You will not bend us out of chan culture no matter how hard you try.
That anon you're responding to is being a brainlet, but the point still stands that confusion arises when Q says there is no Qanon, which seems to contradict our usual process of naming, like when we named meganon because she was talking about Kim and Mega, when we named fbianon because he/she first posted the FBI insignia and when we named bdanon… well, I don't really remember what prompted that.
The idea is that we're breaking from the naming convention and it seems sort of confusing as a result.
Yeah, again, I think Q is saying there is no Qanon because Q itself isn't one person and simultaneously we, collectively, aren't Qanons.
huh? did you respond to the wron gpost?
read back through the conversation, anon…
stop being lazy/tedious.
hardly any of them do not have a handler.
yeah, I'd say we agree. See my post here >>11281440
That doesn't matter. look at the thread on half.
Yeah, but at least we're having fun.
Some are GATE kids, Gifted And Talented Education.
Some are something else entirely, which would best be explained at a later date, after you've been exposed to the requisite insights.
For now, you should just know that some of us are here to help beyond the measure of normies and plenty of [them].
Do you have a bump on the back of your head, just above where your spinal cord meets your skull?
I bet I can guess your bloodtype. Just don't be stupid and post it here.
We've had several threads before where we all discussed some rigid similarities between us.