>That piece had a weird feel to it. Like the author wanted to justify censorship and suppression of news as some sort of protection for the public.
The takeaway from this story (which is a good read) is that WSJ declined to run on the record statements that:
1.) Confirmed the authenticity of some Biden laptop emails
2.) Showed Joe Biden had knowledge of his son’s business activities, contradicting his denials
https://twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1320531424726994945
>>11206292 [Q / pb]
Did Hussein contact Matt Murray in attempt to persuade not to publish?
Will Murray follow the truth or buckle to pressure?
DC civil war.
Watergate x1000.
Q
I don’t know how WSJ explains this.
Bobulinski made a serious allegation that he had backed up by teams of contemporaneous evidence that journalists dream of
https://twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1320534744568913920