Has she been arrested yet?
Has she been arrested yet?
Has she been arrested yet?
Stall for logic a sec.
Q is what?
Three options.
-
Just a vote carnival organised and played with by Trump associates with his nod of approval.
That option kinda would be seditious as Q presumes to be something altogether different. If you lie big to the people, you lie big to the people. No two ways of looking at it.
-
A young guy or group of guys having a ball in their bedrooms making the world go apeshit listening to their fantasyscape James Bondism crap. Satire is hardly seditious. How many novelists of dark, intriguing, espionage stuff try to give the illusion of reality, and often use real names and events to cement the illusion in your mind.
-
Q is as IT (not he) claims. Arm of high clearance US intelligence, designed to drip real time intelligence for a first time across public pathways in order to secure the US from a concerted effort by outside forces, in conjunction with Americans citizens, to knowingly infiltrate, weaken and usurp the very USA itself.
You say that in court, - and it truly is what most people showing up here think - and how the hell could any lawyer assert you are a terrorist?
The worst anyone can be here is fooled - Badly. We await the result on that one in due course. Barr and Durham have a little role in that conclusion, when they get around to it.
"Son, we got an important meeting with our Ukrainian Contact about a five minute drive up the road. You drive. And take the scenic route into the mountains. I need time to think. ………………… I'll sit in the back"
Counting to four
"Hand them to British authorities"
Who proceed to release them. Provide them with shelter, money, maybe a fruit picking job - but that's kinda late - and proceed also to interrogate aggressively the crew, querying whether they are guilty of false imprisionment, kidnapping, torture and racism.
Zero - Bigly.