It is spam.
Anyone including is shown to be a Traitor.
There should be consequences for any past stupidity, and certainly for any going forward.
Case dismissed.
This anon gets it: Projection! >>11284745
Therefore, we look to the projectors, and there will find (((their))) fuckery.
>then the anon opinion seems to be fairly anti-finklestein notables
^^ This should be blatantly obvious Barkeep.
Correct. Fungus is cancer.
>radical free speach
Also for free spEEch.
Why have advocated not to delete Finckles posts early on (previous board). No censorship.
But, to include in NOTES, it to highlight, indicate support, condone, etc. This is wrong, as the vast majority of real anons do not support.
>so what gives?
It's a weak-ass disclaimer.
To allow unopposed, or in Globals, IS a form of endorsement.