Anonymous ID: 3775ac Oct. 26, 2020, 4:42 a.m. No.11285501   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5804

>>11285476

This picture is highly problematic as other current pictures she is not pregnant and the book places this picture near the current time and not 6 months ago or more. It would take a photoshop fag to show if the book is photoshopped or the swelling of the belly.

Anonymous ID: 3775ac Oct. 26, 2020, 5:20 a.m. No.11285828   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5975

>>11285804

The problem is there are current pictures of her now clearly not pregnant, from my understanding - the definitive timing of this and the other pictures, and a several month timeline of no pictures would be required to show a likelyhood of her actually having a baby or being pregnant. If she was pregnant and the timeline fit with the Hunter stripper baby i will be all in..

Anonymous ID: 3775ac Oct. 26, 2020, 5:35 a.m. No.11285958   🗄️.is 🔗kun

The real question is if Hunter niece really pregnant is the story of the Pregnant stripper true at all but a cover for the baby.