>Have you ever seen anything like this before.
Hillary was only coming out half of the time.
People were asking the same questions.
>Have you ever seen anything like this before.
Hillary was only coming out half of the time.
People were asking the same questions.
THIS is why there will be no big BOOMS until after the election.
He doesn't need it.
And it might do more damage, looking like political interference in justice.
THEY invented that term, and we quickly turned it back on them.
They are still annoyed about that.
This whole thing still doesn't make any sense.
What was the angle here?
Immigration fraud?
Looking to get another (African) passport?
What is their asylum policy?
Head fake?
I'm not buying this anti-Wray narrative.
How stupid would it be to allow an enemy to run the FBI for your entire first term?
This is to bait the left to defend Wray, before shtf.
ICE, in the regolith.
Yeah - sure.
How much do you think the public would accept a President secretly firing the head of the FBI and assigning his own personal lawyer to the role???
He would be impeached in a nano-second, and frankly for good reason.
We don't want that kind of 3rd world justice here.
>Rudy is loved by many Americans.
That isn't the point.
If you want to fire Wray and promote Rudy, fine, do it thru the process.
Our corrupt secret police is already bed enough.
We can't advocate or normalize the idea that the public isn't even allowed to know who is running the secret police.
That is despot territory.