Going for the LIBEL angle??
FCC 210 (going off memory) but I think that's more in terms with FB, Google, etc…
THEY^^^ are basically "covered" by simply being a "PLATFORM" (no censoring) and can't be sued by what is placed on their platforms…
WHEN THEY STARTED CENSORING…that changed. They became a PUBLISHER (in essence, deciding what was "publishable")
RICO TOTALLY SOUNDS RIGHT! They're "conspiring" for a uniform narrative….
Argument might be: What are they selling (in terms of a product) to warrant RICO
I'd argue back – since advertising is what KEEPS THEM IN BUSINESS, then OBVIOUSLY SOMETHING IS BEING SOLD!!!!