Victorian law reforms would require rape-murder victim families to apply to court to publicly reveal details

Laws to be debated in Victoria's Parliament today could mean that families of rape-murder victims will need to go to court, at their own cost, before they can publicly reveal their loved one had been a victim of sexual assault at any time before their death.

Key points:

Proposed reforms have unearthed a ban on any publication of information identifying a sexual assault victim without that person's consent, living or deceased

Family members of some victims say the changes would be a "disgrace" and stop them calling for justice

But those who back the changes say it would protect family members who did not want sexual assaults revealed publicly

The proposed changes were backed late on Tuesday by the Law Institute of Victoria and the Director of Public Prosecutions. They say the courts would help decide whether publishing information is in the public interest.

But they have have outraged grieving family members, such as Eileen Culleton, who has labelled it "appalling" and a "disgrace" that will silence campaigns for justice.

"It's an absolute violation of the victim's family members' civil rights, and it's a violation of our dignity," she said.

Ms Culleton has waged a long campaign for life sentences without parole for rapist-murderers, highlighting the case of her sister Anne-Marie, who was killed in 1988.

"[Families] won't be able to call for justice, they won't be able to comment or express outrage at weak sentencing, they won't be able to speak out when the rapist-murderer makes appeals," she said.

"And they won't even be able to publicly oppose parole applications. So the victim family member is absolutely gagged."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-10-28/victoria-law-change-opposed-by-rape-murder-victim-families/12819732

Victoria now protecting rapists, unless you pay them via the corrupt court system

Occult "Creative Destruction" Drives Lockdown

(Take a knee)

It's becoming clear to more people that humanity is controlled

by a satanic cult, the Illuminati.

The #scamdemic lockdowns are inspired by the satanic doctrine

of "Creative Destruction" found in Cabalist Judaism & Freemasonry.

At its basis is the destruction of the old order which was dedicated

to fulfilling God's Will to the New World Order dedicated to serving Satan

and his minions.

In The Controversy of Zion, Douglas Reed writes, "The Protocols [of the Elders of Zion] elevate the theory

of destruction to this status of "a fundamental truth, a primary or basic law, a governing law of conduct'…

In many passages, the Protocols appear, at first sight, to recommend destruction as a thing virtuous in itself,

and consequently justifying all the methods explicitly recommended to promote it (bribery, blackmail, corruption,

subversion, sedition, mob incitement, terror, and violence) which thus become virtuous too." (p. 211)

Think Antifa & BLM. Think Demonrats.

The Doctrine of "Creative Destruction" provides a key to understanding the gratuitous destruction wreaked by lockdowns, mask orders, etc.

According to the Kabbalah, which is the defining doctrine of Judaism and Freemasonry, "Evil and catastrophe [are] endemic factors in the process of creation. Without evil there could be no good, without destruction, creation could not take place." (Kabbalah: An Introduction to Jewish Mysticism, by Byron L. Sherwin, p. 72.)

SATANICALLY POSSESSED

Call it illuminism, secularism, Luciferianism, humanism, paganism or the occult: It's all Kabbalah.

leaders-handsign.jpgModern Western civilization has no moral legitimacy (and no future) because it is based on a rebellion against God, who represents the path of our spiritual development.

Humanity had been hijacked by psychopaths intent on destroying the "old order" and building a bizarre, solipsistic, violent, depraved dystopia in its place.

These psychopaths control our government's credit and mass media. Thus, they are able to purchase our leaders and dupe society into embracing its own downfall.

https://www.henrymakow.com/the_destuctive_principle_of_th.html

'Trump Encourages It': Pittsburgh Jews Still Fear Far-right Violence, Two Years After Massacre

A visit to the Squirrel Hill neighborhood finds many Jewish voters promising to have the last word against a president they regard as America’s inciter in chief since the tragedy at the Tree of Life Synagogue

PITTSBURGH – The fence surrounding the Tree of Life synagogue in the Squirrel Hill neighborhood is covered with messages of unity and hope. They serve as a reminder to the events of October 27, 2018, when a white nationalist murdered 11 worshippers here during the Saturday morning service. But they also represent this community’s response to hatred.

Many Jews in the neighborhood now have another statement to make: President Donald Trump’s rhetoric at the time and failure to condemn white supremacy contributed to the attack and they vow to vote him out of office next Tuesday on Election Day.

“I always believed our government would protect us, whoever the ‘us’ is,” says Meryl Ainsman, 66, a lifelong Pittsburgher and former chair of the local Jewish Federation board. “I don’t feel that anymore,” she adds, sitting in her backyard that’s a 10-minute walk from the Tree of Life.

https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium-two-years-after-massacre-these-pittsburgh-jews-fear-violence-and-blame-trump-1.9263078

Beam Suntory Inc. Agrees to Pay Over $19 Million to Resolve Criminal Foreign Bribery Case

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/beam-suntory-inc-agrees-pay-over-19-million-resolve-criminal-foreign-bribery-case

CNN's "Not Even Pretending Anymore"

Repress (use force to extinguish alternate views), Suppress (prevent normal expression), Depress (force 'the other' into submission by collapsing the Overton Window)… that appears the modus operandi of the mainstream media as we enter the vinegar strokes of this 'unusual' presidential election.

Nowhere was this strategy better exhibited than on CNN this week when Christiane Amanpour sparred with Liz Harrington over the Hunter Biden scandal revelations. Amanpour disparaged Harrington as liberals do: "You actually sound like you're on a Fox News show."

Translation: you're spreading crazy conservative conspiracies…

Amanpour then embarrassed herself further as the CNN anchor accused the Trump campaign of "spreading Russian disinformation"…

“Pretty audacious of CNN who spread actual Russian disinformation w/the leak of the dossier set up briefing in Trump tower to subvert the peaceful transition of power to accuse anyone else of spreading Russian disinformation. And the emails about the "big guy" are real, btw.”

Harrington added:

“Why don’t you want to report this? This is one of the most powerful families in Washington,” she asked.

“And you’re okay with our interests being sold out to profit Joe Biden and his family, while we’re suffering during a pandemic from communist China?”

Watch the full clip here…

Glenn Greenwald - one of the few 'reporters' left - noticed the sham:

"The only silver lining in all of this is that media outlets are so desperate to help Biden win that they're not even pretending anymore. No pretense. There's great clarity in that. "

So, with the unquestionable Amanpour having embarrassed herself, here's another reporter - WSJ's Kimberley Strassel - showing the world what 'reporting' actually should look like.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/cnn-theyre-not-even-pretending-anymore

Wikipedia’s Hunter Biden articles are squeaky clean

Look at this upstanding man:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter_Biden

Feels like the Biden campaign wrote this themselves:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biden–Ukraine_conspiracy_theory

Not even the pretense of balance. 1984 like.

Funny how this is the first paragraph and they use terms like “unevidenced” and “damage” when I thought wikipedia is unbiased?

The Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory is a series of unevidenced claims centered on the false allegation that 2020 Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden engaged in corrupt activities relating to the employment of his son Hunter Biden by the Ukrainian gas company Burisma while he was Vice President of the United States.[1] They have primarily been spread in an attempt to damage Joe Biden’s presidential campaign.[2]

https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/wikipedias-hunter-biden-articles-are-squeaky-clean/

And here we go! Trickle feed disclosure. The MSM about to get ahead of the story. The Rona was always just flu

Many feared ‘twin-demic’ of flu, which kills thousands, and Covid-19 this winter

Thirty million people – 20 per cent more than normal – now eligible for the flu jab

‘Surveillance’ data collected by WHO shows how flu cases plummeted globally

www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-8875201/Has-Covid-killed-flu.html

They count flu cases as the Rona

They count dead PCR cultures and live

All to control you.

It is irrational for a healthy person to take an untested, unproven medication, that is SHIELDED FROM LIABILITY, against a virus that is non-lethal, with a high rate of survival@drsimonegold

—#IDoNotConsent to a rushed vaccine#COVID19 #WhiteCoatSummit pic.twitter.com/planQODbNm

— 🕊🌸⏳#FreeAssange #EndUSWars #StopFundingIsrael (@aerwaves_) October 25, 2020

https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/another-incredible-coincidence/

10 Ways to Call Something Russian Disinformation Without Evidence

The principles of American Newspeak, vol. 1

How do you call something “Russian disinformation” when you don’t have evidence it is? Let’s count the ways.

We don’t know a whole lot about how the New York Post story about Hunter Biden got into print. There are some reasons to think the material is genuine (including its cache of graphic photos and some apparent limited confirmation from people on the email chains), but in terms of sourcing, anything is possible. This material could have been hacked by any number of actors, and shopped for millions (as Time has reported), and all sorts of insidious characters - including notorious Russian partisans like Andrei Derkach - could have been behind it.

None of these details are known, however, which hasn’t stopped media companies from saying otherwise. Most major outlets began denouncing the story as foreign propaganda right away and haven’t stopped. A quick list of the creative methods seen lately of saying, “We don’t know, but we know!”:

Our spooks say it looks like the work of their spooks.

A group of 50 “former senior intelligence officials” wrote a letter as soon as the Post story came out. Their most-quoted line was that the Post story has “all the classic hallmarks of a Russian information operation.” Note they said information operation, not disinformation operation — humorously, even people with records of lying to congress like James Clapper and John Brennan have been more careful with language than members of the news media.

Emphasizing that they didn’t know if the emails “are genuine,” these ex-heads of agencies like the CIA added “our experience makes us deeply suspicious that the Russian government played a significant role in this case,” noting that it appeared to be an operation “consistent with Russian objectives.” Politico, the Boston Globe, the Washington Post, the Daily Beast, and many other outlets ran the spook testimonial.

It was prophesied.

The Washington Post needed four reporters — Shane Harris, Ellen Nakashima, Greg Miller, and Josh Dawsey — to tell us that “four former officials familiar with the matter” spoke of a long-ago report that the would-be source of the Post emails, Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani, had been “interacting with people tied to Russian intelligence” in Ukraine. As such, any information he “brought back” from there “should should be considered contaminated by Russia.” Therefore, by the transitive property of whatever, the New York Post story should be dismissed as part of an “influence” operation.

Authorities are investigating if it might be Russian disinformation.

“The FBI is probing a possible disinformation campaign,” announced USA Today, citing the omnipresent “person familiar with the matter.” Officially, of course, Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe said “Hunter Biden’s laptop is not part of some Russian disinformation campaign,” to which FBI spokesperson Jill C. Tyson officially said the bureau had “nothing to add at this time.”

Many of the outlets who covered this sequence of events described the F.B.I. statement as “carefully worded,” inviting us to read in things left unsaid. Thomas Rid in the Post went so far as to say Tyson was “hinting that actionable intelligence might yet be developed,” which is technically true but also technically meaningless.

More

https://taibbi.substack.com/p/10-ways-to-call-something-russian?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjoyNTM5NjYwLCJwb3N0X2lkIjoxNDc5ODcyOCwiXyI6IlU5cjVaIiwiaWF0IjoxNjAzODI1Mzg3LCJleHAiOjE2MDM4Mjg5ODcsImlzcyI6InB1Yi0xMDQyIiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.aZngFsa5AxN41BACDXUnaBoTxEBSOgRvMF8WlC9k-wk

92 Percent of TV Coverage of Donald Trump Is Negative, Media Research Center Finds

The Media Research Center has published a new study on media coverage for this election and to no one’s surprise, it shows the coverage of Trump by ABC, NBC, and CBS over the last 12 weeks has been 92 percent “negative.”

Coverage of Joe Biden, on the other hand, was 66 percent positive. Perhaps more tellingly, Trump got almost four times the scrutiny that Biden got, with the Democrat getting a pass on many issues.

This time around, it’s obvious that the networks are pouring their energy into confronting and criticizing the President, not equally covering both campaigns. During the twelve weeks we examined, Trump received 839 minutes of coverage, compared to just 269 minutes of airtime for Biden, a three-to-one disparity.

Even more lopsided, our analysts found ten times more evaluative statements about Trump than Biden: 890 comments about the President, of which 822 (92.4%) were negative, vs. 68 (7.6%) that were positive. Note that these totals do not include statements about the candidates’ prospects in the campaign horse race (i.e., standings in the polls, chances to win, etc.), nor does it include partisan statements from the candidates or their surrogates.

It’s been that way from the beginning of Trump’s presidency.

The three evening newscasts have been relentlessly negative throughout Trump’s presidency. From Inauguration Day, January 20, 2017, through October 20, 2020, our analysts have tallied 16,755 evaluative comments, 90.5% of which (15,161) have been negative. While the topics have shifted from the Russia-collusion investigation to Ukraine and impeachment to this year’s coronavirus pandemic, the networks’ hostility has been incredibly consistent.

It’s not just a negative spin in Trump coverage that’s a problem. It’s the lack of coverage of obvious weak points in Biden’s campaign that demonstrates such a laughable bias.

The topics tell the story: Trump’s coverage during these crucial 12 weeks has been dominated by the coronavirus (424 minutes — 284 minutes spent on policy and 140 minutes on the President’s own diagnosis), his comments about mail-in voting (87 minutes) and the ongoing protests in major American cities (63 minutes). Notable controversies include The New York Times’ reporting on Trump’s apparently stolen tax returns (23 minutes), and the hotly-disputed Atlantic story about the President supposedly calling U.S. war casualties “suckers” and “losers” (19 minutes).

The newscasts are airing practically nothing about controversies that could jeopardize Biden’s lead in the polls. Topping the list: the former Vice President’s age and health, with 10 minutes, 33 seconds of coverage — a tiny fraction of the airtime devoted to President Trump’s health following his coronavirus diagnosis (140 minutes).

I recall that in 1984, the three networks couldn’t shut up about Reagan’s age and the fact that he would, if elected, be the oldest serving president.

Fox News:

Hannity said that during the 1984 race, Reagan, then 73, was being slammed by the media and by Democrats who claimed he was showing signs of early-onset dementia at age 73.

He said a Seattle newspaper had referred to him as “old,” and other reports claimed that First Lady Nancy Reagan was “maneuvering” behind the scenes to hide signs of the president’s alleged mental decline.

“The mob and the media back in the day, they raised all the questions everywhere — it was like a mass diagnosis of Ronald Reagan,” Hannity continued.

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/rick-moran/2020/10/27/92-percent-of-tv-coverage-of-donald-trump-is-negative-media-research-center-finds-n1097601

>>11310556

You can fuck off with this shit

NEWFAG ALERT

>>11310601

>>11310601

keep your clown shit out of here