@12:20
Tucker asks Tony for proof of Joe Biden's involvement in these deals.
First, Tony shows James Gilliar's May 13th email of requested profit splits with "10 Jim" (10% to Jim Biden) and "10 held by H for the big guy" (10% to Joe Biden held by Hunter).
Then he shows the finalized deal where Joe Biden's split is absorbed by Jim (Jim's split now being 20%).
Tony wants us to ask why Jim went from a 10% owner to a 20% owner.
IMO, he's simply pointing out that this is how the deal was structured to hide that Joe Biden was receiving profits: Joe Biden asked for 10% and they funneled it to his brother Jim's company.
Why did Joe Biden's split go to Jim instead of Hunter? Since Hunter's company was already receiving 20%, it might be too obvious to add Joe's split to Hunter's. Jim and Hunter both getting 20% looks less shady than Jim getting 10% and Hunter getting 30%. "Hmm…why is Hunter getting so much??" v. "Looks like pretty even splits here.."
Just a thought…