DOJ: "HUNTERS BECAME THE HUNTED"

https://twitter.com/TheJusticeDept/status/1321475384739811329

🚨🚨🚨BOOM🚨🚨🚨

>>11323544

I don't think the gap between the two is as big as you suggest, but, I see your point.

>>11323911

>>11323844

Both of you circlejerking fake narrative faggots are 'folklore'

Cruz's approach with Dorsey should have STARTED with the idea of information.

If there are any Patriots involved in the testifying today are reading this, ask Dorsey these questions:

1. Do you believe that changes in a person's knowledge influences what they do?

Obvious answer is yes.

1. Does a person's knowledge depend on information being visible or invisible?

Obvious answer is visible.

1. Should information be 'managed' in such a way so as to alter what otherwise would have been visible vs. invisible, by way of selective censorship, it stands to reason that the user's KNOWLEDGE would be impacted as well, correct?

Obvious answer is yes.

1. Therefore, if Twitter were to censor or otherwise make 'invisible' information conveyed to its users, it would stand to reason that this would impact the user's KNOWLEDGE as far as what can be acquired from Twitter as well, correct?

Obvious answer is yes.

1. Therefore, you would logically agree then that Twitter's selective censorship of information has an impact on the knowledge of its users and hence an influence in the ACTIONS of its users, in for example their VOTING actions, is that not correct?