Anonymous ID: cc51db Oct. 28, 2020, 8:48 a.m. No.11323626   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3665

Algorithms programmed by content moderators, who decide what should be banned, based on [THEIR GOALS]

Nothing more, nothing less.

Whoever holds the KEYS to TECH is TECH KING. Currently CIA/DARPA/DS agents.

 

Enemy of the PEOPLE.

Anonymous ID: cc51db Oct. 28, 2020, 9:02 a.m. No.11323841   🗄️.is 🔗kun

If the BIG TECH wasn't suppressing the MAIL IN FRAUD issue, perhaps these stupid D's, claiming mail in voting is safe, would STFU.

 

Kavanaugh's Opinion in Wisconsin Voting Case Raises Alarms Among Democrats

 

The Supreme Court decision Monday effectively barring the counting of mail-in ballots in Wisconsin that arrive after Election Day was not a surprise for many Democrats, who had pressed for it but expected to lose.

 

But a concurring opinion by Justice Brett Kavanaugh set off alarms among civil rights and Democratic Party lawyers, who viewed it as giving public support to President Donald Trump’s arguments that any results counted after Nov. 3 could be riddled with fraudulent votes — an assertion unsupported by the history of elections in the United States.

 

The decision also unnerved Democrats and local election officials in Pennsylvania, where Republicans are asking the Supreme Court to weigh in again on whether the state can accept ballots received up to three days after Election Day. While Democrats in Wisconsin had been appealing for an extension, the current rules in Pennsylvania allow for ballots to arrive three days after the election. Any change could threaten the more than 1.4 million absentee ballots not yet returned.

 

In his opinion, attached to the 5-3 ruling against the deadline extension in Wisconsin, Kavanaugh wrote that Election Day mail-in deadlines were devised “to avoid the chaos and suspicions of impropriety that can ensue if thousands of absentee ballots flow in after Election Day and potentially flip the results of an election.”

 

He added, “Those states also want to be able to definitively announce the results of the election on election night, or as soon as possible thereafter.”

 

Kavanaugh’s statement mirrored in some ways Trump’s efforts to suggest that only ballots counted by Election Day should decide the result, and more generally to push unfounded claims about widespread voter fraud.

 

Earlier Monday, the president had posted on Twitter that election officials “must have final total on November 3rd,” alleging without evidence that there are “big problems” with mail-in ballots. Twitter labeled the tweet “misleading.”

 

The Wisconsin ruling was the latest in a series of court decisions setting the rules for how voters in different states can cast their ballots during the coronavirus pandemic and when the cutoff is for receiving them.

 

The Wisconsin ruling revealed a stark divide among the justices in their understanding of the role of the courts in protecting the right to vote during a pandemic and left voting rights activists concerned about how the court’s conservative majority would rule in any postelection fights.

 

With Trump indicating that he plans to challenge a loss, Democrats have kept a particularly wary eye on the Supreme Court.

 

It was the court that rendered the final decision in the Florida recount of 2000, effectively delivering the state to George W. Bush over Al Gore by just 537 votes and, with it, the presidency. In rushing to name a successor to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg upon her death last month, Trump indicated that he believed the Supreme Court might again determine the winner, saying, “I think this will end up in the Supreme Court, and I think it’s very important that we have nine justices.”

 

He suggested that he expected the court to weigh in on his charges of election fraud, saying: “The scam will be before the United States Supreme Court. And I think having a 4-4 situation is not a good situation.”

 

The concept expressed by Kavanaugh that counting late-arriving ballots could “flip the results” misconstrues the voting process, where official results often are not fully tabulated for days or even weeks after an election.

 

More

https://news.yahoo.com/kavanaughs-opinion-wisconsin-voting-case-121221776.html

Anonymous ID: cc51db Oct. 28, 2020, 9:36 a.m. No.11324314   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11324258

Seems no different than anything else they hijack to twist to confuse.

 

Remember, we are still "RUSSIAN BOTS" pushing disinformation. That is how they've blanketed the BIG TECH suppression this entire time. Listening to the continued BS today at the hearing, it's clear.

The D's will say anything Truthful is Russian Disinformation, and HAS TO BE QUASHED. Including POTUS as the election confusion game is High Stakes for them.

Anonymous ID: cc51db Oct. 28, 2020, 9:59 a.m. No.11324587   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11324542

Non of them are in control of their own platforms. They were all useful idiots, paid a shit ton of money, to be the mules for the CIA.

Hunter Biden's of BIG TECH. Pack mules, Useful Idiots, Talking heads, Puppets.

In truth, they are ENEMIES of the PEOPLE who Sold their Souls.