Anonymous ID: 8317be Oct. 28, 2020, 10:12 p.m. No.11337407   šŸ—„ļø.is šŸ”—kun   >>7430 >>7481 >>7482 >>7494 >>7628 >>7766 >>7905

Putin Defends Bidens, Becomes ā€˜Visibly Irritatedā€™ When Asked About $3.5 Million Moscow Payment To Hunter

 

Russian President Vladimir Putin defended Hunter Biden on Sunday, saying the saw ā€˜nothing criminalā€™ regarding his past business ties with Ukraine or Russia, according to Reuters.

 

Putinā€™s statement would seem to fly in the face of the MSMā€™s latest conspiracy theory that heā€™s somehow behind the release of Hunter Bidenā€™s alleged laptop contents, and you should believe that ā€˜whether or not itā€™s true.ā€™ It would also suggest that Putin never possessed, or hasnā€™t read the New York Postā€˜s undisputed evidence that Hunter introduced a Burisma adviser to his father eight months before Joe Biden pressured Ukraine to fire their Prosecutor General, who was investigating Burisma at the time.

 

Putin appeared less friendly towards Trump in remarks broadcast by Russian state TV on Sunday. In what may be seen by some analysts as an attempt to try to curry favour with the Biden camp, he took the time to knock down what he made clear he regarded as false allegations from Trump about the Bidens.

 

ā€œYes, in Ukraine he (Hunter Biden) had or maybe still has a business, I donā€™t know. It doesnā€™t concern us. It concerns the Americans and the Ukrainians,ā€ said Putin. ā€“Reuters

 

ā€œBut well yes he had at least one company, which he practically headed up, and judging from everything he made good money. I donā€™t see anything criminal about this, at least we donā€™t know anything about this (being criminal),ā€ said the Russian leader ā€“ who leftists in America have spent four years insisting is extremely corrupt, and will now lionize as a paragon of truth.

 

According to the report, Putin ā€œreacted with visible irritationā€ over question regarding an alleged $3.5 million payment made to Hunter Biden the ex-Moscow Mayorā€™s widow ā€“ responding that he knew nothing about a commercial relationship between Hunter and the woman who President Trump said was tied to Putin during last weekā€™s debate.

 

https://truepundit.com/putin-defends-bidens-becomes-visibly-irritated-when-asked-about-3-5-million-moscow-payment-to-hunter/

Anonymous ID: 8317be Oct. 28, 2020, 10:17 p.m. No.11337533   šŸ—„ļø.is šŸ”—kun   >>7549 >>7766 >>7905

Will They Really Get Away With It?

 

Forty government officials were indicted or jailed as a result of Watergate. White House staffers H.R. Haldeman and John Erlichman went to jail. White House counsel John Dean went to jail. Attorney General John Mitchell went to jail. Howard Hunt, G. Gordon Liddy, Charles Colson and James McCord ā€“ all jailed. Nixon Press Secretary Ronald L. Ziegler called Watergate a "third-rate burglary." It toppled a president.

 

"Obamagate," or the "Russia Hoax" is a political and criminal scandal exponentially more serious and damaging to the constitution. Like the Richter Scale measurements of earthquakes, Obamagate can be measured in "orders of magnitude" greater seriousness than the third-rate burglary. Obamagate is the First American Coup. Not from the militaristic right, as fantasized by liberal Hollywood. Oh, no ā€“ from the "fundamental transformation" artists of the Bolshevik Left.

 

Writing in the New York Post on October 24, 2020, columnist Michael Goodwin listed his reasons for voting for Donald Trump, again. His reasoning included:

 

"The other side must not be rewarded for its efforts to sabotage and remove a duly-elected president.

 

"Russia, Russia, Russia was a scam that ruined lives and put a cloud over the White House for nearly three years. The sequel was partisan impeachment, a clumsy coup attempt orchestrated by Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Trump haters in Congress, the deep state, and the media.

 

"The press corps' bias of 2016 has morphed into full-blown partisanship on a daily basis at print, digital and broadcast outlets. Facebook, Twitter and other platforms openly use their power to censor pro-Trump news and opinion while promoting anything that makes the president look bad.

 

"It's not the algorithms; it's the people behind them.

 

"Their decision to block The Post's groundbreaking reports on Hunter Biden's business deals and Joe Biden's involvement should scare anyone who treasures the First Amendment. To censors, Orwell's nightmare is their dream.

 

"All fairness has been abandoned in a frenzy to destroy Trump and everything he represents. This culture war extends backward, too."

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/will-they-really-get-away-it

Anonymous ID: 8317be Oct. 28, 2020, 10:25 p.m. No.11337674   šŸ—„ļø.is šŸ”—kun   >>7766 >>7905

Legendary Golfer Cautions Critics Who Hate Trump's Tweets: 'His Love for Americaā€¦.Has Come Through Loud and Clear'

 

In the world of golf, you wonā€™t find a bigger name. And it tells you all you need to know that, even if youā€™re not at all familiar with the sport, youā€™ve probably heard his name before.

 

Jack Nicklaus is considered the ā€œgolferā€™s golferā€ ā€” and might be the best to ever play the game on a professional level. Only Tiger Woods can get close to what Nicklaus has achieved. And though one of his records fell recently, according to PGA Tour.com, there are plenty more where that came from, when you take even a casual look at his legendary records:

 

73 PGA Tour victories

 

18 Major tournament victories

 

20 International victories

 

19 Additional victories

 

58 2nd Place finishes

 

Career Low round: 62

 

Now, heā€™s made an endorsement in the 2020 presidential race: President Donald Trump, whom you might know owns several golf courses. Also, if youā€™ve played a round or two of golf in your time, you may have seen Nicklausā€™ name emblazoned on courses, too, nationally and internationally that meet his exacting standards.

 

Back in July, he took some criticism for insisting on shaking hands at the 18th tee with the winner of the Memorial tournament, which is held at Muirfield, one of his courses. According to the Sun, he said,

 

ā€œIā€™m going to shake their hand.

 

Iā€™m going to walk right out there and shake their hand.

 

If they donā€™t want to shake my hand, thatā€™s fine.

 

Incidentally, I like shaking their hand too.

 

I think itā€™s a great tradition, but itā€™s as much fun for me as I hope it is for them.ā€

 

Much like the man himself, Nicklaus doesnā€™t hold back in his endorsement statement. And itā€™s a blunt rebuttal to anyone who might have implied, for over four years, that Trumpā€™s tweets and strong personality disqualify him from holding high office.

 

He begins with the simple exclamation: ā€œGet out and vote. I did!ā€

 

https://redstate.com/beccalower/2020/10/29/golf-nicklaus-trump-endorsement-n271455

Anonymous ID: 8317be Oct. 28, 2020, 10:34 p.m. No.11337815   šŸ—„ļø.is šŸ”—kun   >>7905

Facebook missteps stoke fears of long political ad blackout online

 

When Facebook and Google announced plans to ban new political ads around the end of the election, they left one key thing out of the new policies: an end date.

 

Now, as Facebookā€™s pre-election blackout on new ads begins and a total post-election freeze on Google and Facebook ads looms, digital strategists in both parties are worried that ads on the biggest digital platforms may never come back ā€” or, at the very least, theyā€™ll be down so long that they paralyze campaigns in major races set to stretch beyond Nov. 3.

 

Those fears spiked in recent days after Facebookā€™s blackout started Tuesday with the social media giant taking down ads that groups in both parties said had been pre-approved. A day and a half later, many groups said they are still struggling to resolve these inconsistencies with the companiesā€™ advertising reps.

Representatives of Facebook and Google said that their political ad bans were temporary.

 

ā€œOur intention is to block political and issue ads only for a short period of time,ā€ a Facebook spokesperson said in an emailed statement. ā€œAs part of our efforts to protect the integrity of this election, we are temporarily blocking the creation of any new political and issue ads during the final week of the election and all political and issue ads in the electionā€™s immediate aftermath.ā€

 

A Democratic digital strategist, granted anonymity to speak candidly, said thereā€™s an ā€œextreme level of concern that political ads are going to be banned outright.ā€ Another Republican digital consultant said heā€™s ā€œsurprisedā€ they havenā€™t already banned political ads to ā€œavoid the headache,ā€ but ā€œif they do, Congress will probably be more willing to regulate them.ā€

 

ā€œA total ban on political advertising by Facebook and Google would be catastrophic,ā€ said Eric Wilson, a GOP digital consultant who worked on Marco Rubioā€™s 2016 presidential campaign. ā€œTogether, they account for the vast majority of online advertising. This would shut off candidates, PACs, and issue advocacy groups from reaching voters.ā€

 

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/28/facebook-political-ad-blackout-433532