FAST JACK WILL LOCK THIS BREAD IN ABOUT 5 MINUTES.
Taking away the only options anons have to police shit bakers.
WOULD ANONS MOVE TO A NON-FASTJACK AND NON-/COMMS/ CONTROLLED BOARD IF IT WAS CREATED?
Joe Biden PARTNERED With Chinese COMMUNISTS For $30M | Rudy Giuliani | Ep. 81
>>>11337529 (You) /abcu/ had nothing to do with additions to dough
>
>Or they would spell our name correctly
>
>"American Broadcasting CommUnity"
>
>07
>
Bun of how Awesome Laughing_Man sucked /comms/ dick when he thought anons would choose them
>
>Thanks you OSS. Some know me at Patchfag or @babyfist.
>
>>>11337521 (You)
>
>>>11337503 (You)
>
>>>11337497 (You)
>
>>>11337475 (You)
>
>>>11337487 (You)
>
>>>11337548 (You)
>
>>>11337566 (You)
FIFY
I'M A SUPER SPY AND TOTALLY NOT A LARP
yES, i SPEND TIME THERE TALKING SHIT AND GETTING THEM TO OUT THEMSELVES FOR WHAT THEY ARE, YOU SPEND TIME ON YOUR KNEES ASKING DOC TO GIVE YOU A REACH AROUND.
>Never said I was a spy said i do Project Managemen
I still have the screenshots of you claiming to be NSA and Military Intel you stupid fuck.
>My second set of quads tonight
And both sets were posts of me calling out patch_fag for the faggot larper he is.
3642e0
>3642e0
>3642e0
3642e0
DUAL BOXING TO COMPLIMENT/DEFEND YOURSELF MAKES YOU LOOK EVEN MORE GAY PATCHFAGGOT.
You have 5 posts in this bread, 4 defending patchfaggot and one claiming to not be patchfaggot. Do you think anons are stupid?
WHEN KEK IS 100% WITH YOU AND ALSO HATES PATCHFAGGOT
>>11336666 (You)
>>11337777 (You)
>You have 6 posts in this bread, 5 defending patchfaggot and one claiming to not be patchfaggot. Do you think anons are stupid?
i remember when q said this right after you inserted your links in the dough
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: f457dc No.11118631 📁
Oct 17 2020 11:36:26 (EST)
https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746📁
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
You are correct, CJ.
Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]
Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?
Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.
Q
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: f457dc No.11118631 📁
Oct 17 2020 11:36:26 (EST)
https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746📁
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
You are correct, CJ.
Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]
Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?
Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.
Q
>Well, I'm beginning to think that some of them are stupid.
Not enough of us for the dumb shit you try to pass off to worh though. Sorry, you failed.