This is a distraction. Something shiny. Focusing on this aspect allows them to dismiss the laptop contents as salacious and the entire story as a political smear. I understand the appeal of moral outrage. So do they. They rely on that response to deploy their smokescreen.
Anons uncovered some suspicious political donations tied to the ice cream company. The thought was Pelosi and others featured the brand to alert 'donors' to a new laundering channel.
It's true financial crimes can be made to seem less important or can mire the normies in confusing details. This kind of sex story can be obfuscated with a statement such as 'this is a family matter and the family requests privacy to protect a minor child.' They dangle salacious sex because they know the value of the distraction. It's chaff, or flares, - a false target.
The public understands treason quite plainly, however. Treason at multiple levels of our government has taken place.
I've given your reply an honest effort, Anon, but I don't understand the phrase 'single spamming', I haven't witnessed any crying, and your reference to 'this post' is ambiguous. Sorry.
What if we accidentally release it all?
Sensationalism and scandal can be used to distract from the truth. By all means dig for the truth. The truth is much bigger than this board or bakers, shitty or not. Baker fights and Notables disputes are distractions, too.