>>11344366

>Anyone else find it weird that there has been no Q post in nearly a week?

Not at all.

You've had three years of training to get you to think for yourself.

Hopefully, so y'all don't need Q to post everyday for the rest of your lives.

Cause that would kinda defeat the purpose of all the training.

Either way. There have been longer periods without Q posts in the past. A week or two is a typical "break" from Q posts.

Besides. There is so much coming out into the light, I doubt Q needs to point us to info, when it's finally being reported, at least by a few news agencies. I'm sure I'm not the only one who'd rather see actual action being taken, as opposed to vague drops about what may or may not happen [soon]. We'll see

>>11344103

That entire image looks shooped

>>11344216

>I was told once that shrews survived the meteor and were one of the only creatures that survived and eventually evolved to create all mammalian animals today. They survived because shrews are damned good at prepping.

What you were told was/is a boldface lie.

First, it was definitely NOT a meteor that caused mass extinctions.

Second, the catastrophes were always followed with sudden bursts of "new" species in the flaura and fauna of Earth. This was because of the intense radiation which accompanied said catastrophic events, which causes mutations to occur at a MUCH faster rate that breeding ever could. DNA has the ability to sense changes i the environment and make necessary adaptations to ensure survival of "Life".

Third, everything occurred in a MUCH shorter time frame than what we were originally told. This is primarily because "science" has been comped to deny reality, in favor for propaganda designed with the explicit intent to destroy our civilization from within, via infiltration through indoctrination.

I could go on. But the point is, don't just blindly believe whatever you are told. Question shit.

>>11344546

That witch better bring her broom…