>>11344761 (lb)

>I was listening to Anthony Patch describe how CERN may use strangelets to cause (paraphrasing) the splitting of quarks by overcoming their natural nuclear bond. This would create a violent rip in the fabric of space time. (Stranger Things anyone?)

I just want you to know that all that non-sense about "space-time" fabric is complete fictional bull shit. Physics went off the rails pretty much with Einstein. Many were outspoken against his bat-shit "theories", including Nikola Tesla.

Physics of the 19th Century laid the groundwork for basically every bit of technology we have today. Einstein was a smokescreen, which they used to retard the field of physics and "science" by several centuries.

There are not four fundamental" forces in Nature. Only One. Weak nuclear force is basically the relationship between ionic bonds. This is very easily understandable from an electrical perspective as ions are basically atoms that carry a positive or negative charge.

The "strong nuclear force" is basically just the Electromagnetic bonds that hold atoms together. Very strong, indeed.

The Electromagnetic Force is real.

"Gravity" is basically static cling on a Gaussian Sphere, created by a dipole effect that slightly skews the electron from the nucleus, in every atom the makes up "Earth".

There is definitely a voltage potential between the surface of the Earth and "outer space" that surrounds us. Although, for over a century, "experts" claim that is a "preposterous" notion to even suggest, because they think charges automatically cancel each other out. This defies many known observations, including the one stated above.

As for "space-time". There is "space". And there is "time". There is no "space-time". Nor is there "fabric" of…

"Time" is a unit of measurement, completely independent of "space". "Space" is merely the distance between point charges, which are not randomly scattered, but organized out of the chaos, by the Electromagnetic Force, which powers every star and galaxy in our Universe.

P.S. There was no "big bang".

P.P.S. Reality is far stranger than fiction. And infinitely moar marvelous

>>11345848

>now, where is the stash of new "old physics" located?

Pretty sure the Military understand WTF is up. Also, the industrial trades seem to have a firm grasp. The general public, not so much. But that's in part due to the media manipulation. And the comped "education" system. Maybe if you go to school to be an Electrical Engineer you'll learn a lot of the god stuff, without too much of the fictional BS. Really, anyone can take a class on the physics of the Electromagnetic Force. You can watch some on youtube even. Although, institutions are comped, and usually sprinkle in the misinformation, in part because they are a business and do offer classes in hogwash. So, it's not good for them to outright tell you that the next class "up" in physics, is primarily based on BS, to retard you into submission.

Shitty part is, many of the tech jobs got sent overseas awhile ago. So, it's not always the best idea for someone to go into a course where you'd have to learn new languages and travel halfway across the world to find a job just so you can pay back your student loans. I never made it that far in life. So, I'm really just a "fringe conspiracy theorist". Although, I can school quite a few professors in a variety of fields of study.

>in the electric universe crowd?

They are comfy. Wal Thornhill is an Electrical Engineer. As is Donald Scott, and a few others in the Thunderbolts Project. It's why they have such a firm grasp on "breakthrough" information, and can accurately predict many "discoveries" "science" will make just so they can be "perplexed" by their "mysterious" findings