Possible
Well reasoned possibility
Time will tell
I love it when non technical peeps
Chime in with all these great ideas
Keep mowing lawns anon
Or by all means, tell CM how he can code an identify friend or foe tool for the site that does not destroy UX for regular anons
Can you legally carry a concealed weapon (if licensed) to vote?
In anticipation of Tuesday
Good for you concealed carry fags
And you niggers that don't outsource your personal safety to the local law dogs that take upwards of 20 minutes to respond …
Check your local laws re: concealed carry at a polling location
This website is a guide
CHECK YOUR STATE and LOCAL LAWS
This website is just a guide
Carry responsibly
https://concealednation.org/2018/11/does-your-state-allow-being-armed-while-voting/
>nothing monumental has been done to handle these people that are damaging our nations
Your concern niggering is faggot
>They are going to kill every pro America voice out there and anyone who denies that is not paying attention to their words and actions.
^ Nope. Go predict the next winner of your sport of choice if you are so good predicting the future
>I would have appreciated them being handled as the traitors they are
^ And you know everything about everything that happens behind the scenes? How do you know they aren't being treated as traitors? How do you know we are at where we are at by design?
>the right is full of complete wimps who do nothing to get things done (politician wise) and allow themselves to get ran over by lies, deceit and foreign control.
^ Define "the right" there are RHINOs and comped individuals in the halls of power on both sides of the isle… so who is "the right exactly"?
>Trump was the last hope to get things done
^ Promises made promises kept. When you can get Gavin Newsome to say that about you in a news conference you are the shit and have accomplished something.
> all I see is more stupid shit about Hunter fucking whores with no charges about their sale of the country to the Chinks.
^ Right. And the fact you think this is no big deal shows why you are being told by other anons to stop typing. your youth and lack of discernment is showing – this is a mushroom cloud laying motherfucker, motherfucker in the political world. this is an atom bomb for Biden and the longer it goes unaddressed and under/un-reported the better it is for POTUS because it makes His case stronger.
Now back to lurking with you
Baker, you know what to do
Notable
Breaking 911 Tweet: 8th Circuit struck down voting extension - all ballots in MN to be received by 8PM, Nov 3
Additional Sauce to support Breaking 911 Twat…
https://www.kare11.com/article/news/politics/elections/court-minnesota-absentee-ballots-must-be-received-by-election-day/89-6dccc710-c1eb-46ea-8b92-4f6e12e5efe8
With less than a week until the election, a ruling by the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals has struck down an extension for Minnesota election offices to receive mail-in absentee ballots, dramatically altering the timeline for Minnesota voters.
In a ruling issued Thursday, the court overturned the state's plan to allow mail-in ballots to be received by election offices within seven days of the election (Nov. 10) if the ballots were postmarked by Election Day (Nov. 3).
As a result of the ruling, all absentee ballots must now be received by county election offices by 8 p.m. on Election Day, Tuesday, Nov. 3.
"The democratically-enacted election rules in Minnesota provide that mail-in votes must be received by 8:00 p.m. on Election Day in order to be counted (or 3:00 p.m. if delivered in person). Minn. Stat. § 203B.08. The rule of law, as established by the United States Constitution and the Minnesota Legislature, dictates these rules must be followed notwithstanding the Secretary’s instructions to the contrary," the ruling stated. "There is no pandemic exception to the Constitution."
However, in a dissenting opinion, one of the judges noted the late date of the ruling, and its potential impact on Minnesota voters.
"The court’s injunctive relief has the effect of telling voters—who, until now, had been under the impression that they had until November 3 to mail their ballots—that they should have mailed their ballots yesterday (or, more accurately, several days ago). With the court’s injunction in place, fewer eligible Minnesotans will be able to exercise their fundamental right to vote. That, in and of itself, should give us significant pause before granting injunctive relief," Judge Jane Kelly wrote in her dissent.
It's currently unclear if Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon will appeal the ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court.
This is a developing story. Stay with KARE 11 for updates.
KEK