Anonymous ID: 7172d1 Oct. 29, 2020, 5:22 p.m. No.11350279   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0405 >>0540 >>0589

>>11350225

There is no 1st amendment right to use somebody elses property to express your point of view.

Case law on 47 USC 230 is complicated, but suffice it to say that information "flow" is highly controlled by money and power interests.

Our press is only slightly more "free" than the press in North Korea and China. Approved messages only, with a smattering of controlled dissent to make it appear "real" and complete.