>>11367496

>I self confirmed after 100 posts went by and baker refused to respond.

But but but they said it was the first time he baked, but used the stupid idea of using a pic with the date on to identify themselves. It couldnt have been doc! I do hope the sarcasm is noted as that entire story was obvious bullshit while it was being spread as well.

>>11367541

And now they copy and paste Q drops from here, AFTER accusing us of pilfering information from them and putting it here. Sad. I pitty them as humans.

>>11367875

>/SputnikInt

Good grief

>>11367950

>this id was actually ingenious. simple, handwritten, less likely to be gamed

You must suck at photoshop