>>11369608
>Could I jump back in and bake or is there some registration/proof system involved?
Anons can bake. What the drama started as with OSS, what, a month ago now?
Right now, if you think /warroom/ will freely hand you the Bake though, would be kekking hard.
These two returned late last bread, nearly at the same time:
>>11369566
>>11369567 (only 2 posts LB)
>>11369620
>So now I'm /warroom/
>kek.
We'll see Baker.
>>11369651
>barkeep is a gem and if we're voting that anon gets my vote.
Would agree, helped right the ship just in time before Q came back.
>>11369640
>Imposters everywhere.
Was not implying I'm BK. Image was to call attention, from LB's question:
>>11369519 (PB)
Simply a continuity thing.
>>11369628
>hi. Bet you are an imposter.
See answer above. Read more:
>rt BKanon (pic for attention):
Translation: Reply To BarKeep anon (pic used to call attention quickly to post using visual).
>>11369677
>but I dont think current baker on duty is Gerbil
Could be completely wrong, but watching patterns. See post (if it's worth the effort):
>>11369123 (PB)
Believe that's one anon, tracked throughout the day. Same as was frothing at the mouth for the Bake handoff.
Note this pattern with the "handoff" - more like "taking the bake" in #14518:
>>11367167 (PB) TYB!!!
Please don't hand off to: ee881a (current baker)
(Posted 7 seconds after Dough??? Shills are REEing hard over Bread Boss)
>>11367170 (PB)
>>11367270 (PB)
Anon was watching Dough come out of oven, pouncing on it before the peel had even entered the room (7 seconds, KEK).
Also, done [knowing] you'd respect the "first takers" principle, and allow to proceed.
As long as all anons have eyes on, and avoid fuckery, it really doesn't matter who has the peel in their hand at the oven.