>>11374153 (pb)
you should learn history and then maybe you won't sound like a cult-parrot or someoen who knows the code of cult-parrots and tries to fuck with them.
no one is impressed with your overuse of a 40 dollar word that only cultists or those who try to debunk cults would know about.
the way that 'numbers' are used to hypnotise the cult victims has always been clear to me.
understand the real use of numbers in architecture, and the logic of odds and evens does help one designe a more useful building, following code of where the doors and windows will go, how many columns, how many arches, evens and odds.
or if you need to divide things fairly.
your use of numbers is only to confuse or to pretend to be an expert.
trickery is what you attempt.
it shows you not to be sincere. It shows you as an unctious rabid control freak.
you fail as a shill, you fail as a friend, you fail as a mystic. Who can save you now?
PS: is initals add up to . . .
just kidding, he has so many different names that to add it all up would be infinity.