>>11390340 (pb)

People used to say to me, “It must be great being chief of staff, you have a lot of fun.” I would say, “No, you don’t have a lot of fun. It’s a very difficult job. But you never go home at night wondering what you’re doing with your life.” Being chief of staff was great, and I really do think it was harder. For instance, when I was a senator, I showed up at the wrong place, not any important or big things, but if from some kind of mess-up in scheduling, I showed up at the wrong room (which never happened to me, because my scheduler, Kathy Chung, was absolutely incredible), it wouldn’t bother me that much. So what? But boy, when I was chief of staff, if they had sent Senator Biden to the wrong place, I would have been so upset—not with everybody else, just with myself. There’s a lot more stress.

https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/Kaufman_5.pdf

FOR HOW MANY PEOPLE DID KATHY CHUNG “SCHEDULE”?

Was Kathy Chung the Awan version of assistants?

That’s three dems i have found so far that she has been their “scheduler”.

Udell (senator) from colorado

Kaufman (senator) from Delaware

VP Biden (formerly senator)

Kathy Chung

Worked as Senator Bidens assistant

Worked as VP Bidens assistant

Ted Kaufman was Bidens assistant

Ted Kaufman is now a US Senator

Kathy Chung is now his assistant

Starting to think Kathy Chung is a spook.

Try finding a photo of her.

>>11390626

Kathy Chung is Mark Udells “scheduler” as well

How interesting

>>11390677

Uhh

did you miss the shit ton of bots at the beginning of bread?

Now if finklestein and ebot and all of them don’t show up, i would be more convinced of it working, but right now i am skeptical.

>>11390695

Telling you, i think she is a spook

Can find references, but nothing personal

The biggest tell is her being completely absent in any photos.

>>11390994

ANONS

Am digger, check my post history, many not be able to go back more than two or three breads today.

But I am anon. Not a shill.

I am ok with changing the banner to say only Q research.

I don’t believe the hype about changing the banner to defeat bots. That is just incredibly stupid and it’s probably false even in this bread.

I don’t believe that we need to change it because of the whole media Qanon thing. However, i do believe that argument has some merit.

What I do NOT agree with is the manner in which this was forced upon us by shill bakers.

No discussion, no anon input requested. They changed the banner and said “fuck you” to anyone who disagreed.

There was no choice given, no opportunity to give anons a voice. The only people who do that kind of shit are totalitarian communists and democrats. They don’t allow discussion because they know they would lose so they force it upon you and make YOU adapt.

That is absolute fucking bullshit. And that is why I fight.

Now if you baker faggots want to have an open discussion to talk about changing the banner to read just Q research? I’m all onboard. But have that fucking discussion.

Don’t just change the banner arbitrarily and force us to call you fucktards out, taking time away from digging and sharing info (which i believe is the purpose).