>baker comms is a psyop division troll track, a veering off into a sideshow clown demonstration of sock-it-to-em bobbles and their dongle parts.
No.
This is propaganda.
Look at the tone of the message - nasty, divisive, ridiculing.
What kind of 'anons' behave that way?
Stop name-calling.
The idea of anonymity is a security measure.
No anon should tell another whether they should be completely anonymous or not.
Many anons have 'names' - ResignationAnon, GMTanon, etc. Usually, the names have something to do with the function they serve.
Q has a 'name' too.
Calling everyone namefags and famefags is just a divide-and-conquer technique.
>No more baking of any kind,
sounds a lot more like antifa than patriots.
Trying to destroy board's connection with QNOTABLES now?
Divide and conquer.
>spam bots run off the graphic
FJ made same argument about per post catchas last year - it was just to deal with spam bots, shills.
Remember?
>within the context of the display of discord shilling that went on for about a month
Then please say what you consider to be 'discord shilling.'
yes there's a disruptive backstory all right
nothing to do with comms bakers tho.
OSS.
>Kek, you are attempting to conflate things
>They are two different things
Why different?
I am making an analogy.
Why don't you provide an argument as to why that analogy is not apt?
>Captchas worked for about two breads to deter bots
I remember. They simply reprogram the bots.