Dan Scavino๐บ๐ธ๐ฆ
๐บ๐ธ๐ฆ
https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/1322939619592314881
>Yes, that's the tweet
Dan Scavino๐บ๐ธ๐ฆ
๐บ๐ธ๐ฆ
https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/1322939619592314881
>Yes, that's the tweet
Boston Globe 'Opinion Columnist' Tweeted these images
Also works for NPR
Renรฉe Graham
@reneeygraham
See the difference? Me neither.
https://twitter.com/reneeygraham/status/1322586265850728457
https://archive.is/g1JQ5
>Sauce
POTUS
In Lufkin, Texas โ someone was stealing Trump signs, so an anonymous tree climber put up 30 of them throughout the community. Love it, thank you! #MAGA
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1321144951430729728
>Leave the notables
>fuck off
NO
>>11391204 [pb]
>o7 anons
>Let it be stated throughout Q Research. QAnon, Q_Anon is dead. Long live Q Research.
>By edict of Q and by edict of 'tidy', QAnon and Q_Anon shall be forever stricken from the Q Research marketing materials. So it is written. So it shall be done. In the name of stopping Fake News narratives everywhere, so it is ordered.
>o7 anons
>>11391297[pb]
>QAnon / Q_Anon is what they will use to take the crazy ass moo joo, the massive porn spam and all the other crazy shit we type and talk about it and say "look what QAnon is spewing, hate and porn".
>We can't let that happen. There is Q and there is Anon. Q is not QAnon. Anon is not QAnon.
>Think Anons
>Affordable Care Act = Unaffordable Care Act
>New Green Deal = New Green Shaft
>Cash for Clunkers = Wealth Re-distribution
>THEY TWIST WORDS FOR NARRATIVES and they will twist QAnon as a narrative to stop people from waking up.
>When you see people arguing about keeping QAnon or Q_Anon, is it about keeping their 'tradition' or is it about keeping their 'narrative'? We don't protect a graphic. We protect the integrity of Q.
>Wake up anons - purge QAnon / Q_Anon from everything. Purge it from the Meme cards, from graphics. Most of all purge it from your vocabulary. THIS IS NOT A GAME