Anonymous ID: 065b06 Nov. 1, 2020, 1:31 p.m. No.11395652   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5675 >>5698 >>5748

>>11395602

Q made it pretty clear if you actually read the Q Post that 'QAnon / Q_Anon' is going to be used to tie Q to what anons post. People choose to see what they want to see. Out of everybody that's commented over the last 14 hours there have only been 2 or 3 (all from Midnight Riders board or 'comms crew') that refuse to stop using the term 'QAnon / Q_Anon'. That tells a lot of people who MNR and Comms are. We protect Q's flank on QResearch by making the requested change to remove all instances of 'QAnon / Q_Anon'. I don't know what else to say.

Anonymous ID: 065b06 Nov. 1, 2020, 1:39 p.m. No.11395763   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5802 >>5831

>>11395698

All I can tell you is Q and QTeam moved heaven and earth to give us this board of free speech. If I can do a small thing like help remove all instances of QAnon / Q_Anon from the Q Research board I'm going to do it. It's odd that you're fighting it so hard. Almost like you have some ulterior motive. I've asked over and over for a justification of why we should keep the term when Q said remove all instances of it and all I've heard is blustering foolishness. Sorry anon, call them like I see them.

Anonymous ID: 065b06 Nov. 1, 2020, 1:44 p.m. No.11395837   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5852

>>11395785

There it is. I knew the attacks would start on Barkeep. So… Barkeep, OSS and Anime sit every night and offer to train Bakers while they bake and collect notables and keep the bakery tidy. Oh no, Comms Bakers, who we fired for rewriting and deleting our notables and now they have their own board, are attacking them because they're a threat to them re-taking control of QResearch. Anons are aware of the whole saga now.