>>1139559 (last bread)

You didn't read did you? The cells are a testing tool, not the end product.

You're one of the reasons why people dismiss this movement in the mainstream. You need to do actual research, not knee jerk emotional confirmation bias.

Granted there are taboos to genetic modification, but there are benefits. I dare you to tell your diabetic friends and family to stop taking their insulin because made from human dna in yeast cells.

> Insulin and insulin analogs are by far the dominating biopharmaceuticals produced by yeast, and this will increase as the global insulin market is expected … demonstrating the utility and applicability of genetic engineering in creating genetically engineered bacteria that produce these two human proteins.

https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3728191/

>>1139815

See there's that lack of research again, wild animals also get diabetes and cancer

https:// www.livescience.com/9680-cancer-kills-wild-animals.html

http:// www.diabetesandenvironment.org/home/mice

>>1139894

No it doesn't, those weren't around thousands of years ago

>researchers have diagnosed an aggressive type of cancer called osteosarcoma in a foot bone belonging to a human relative who died in Swartkrans Cave between 1.6 and 1.8 million years ago.

>In 1990, for instance, autopsies performed on thousand-year-old mummies in Peru revealed at least one case of a woman in her mid-30s with a malignant tumor in her upper-left arm.

https:// news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/07/oldest-human-cancer-disease-origins-tumor-fossil-science/