Washing the clothes requires a bit of agitation, anon.
Deep cleaning.
In my experience, none of the people arguing about it are regularly doing active research, anyway.
People in a research dig go on a dig, come back with their findings, and then usually get called a shill and the baker gets criticized for including anything other than headlines and random tweets.
If there are distractions, it is usually involving disinformation, prompting people to excitedly rush off and research glorbon the globulescent and his plan for raiding our bilbos - and to spread that debate beyond the board.
The attack on the board at the moment is a disruption of planned disinformation campaigns. None of the arguments here will propagate strongly outside the board and tie up resources for planned disinfo - and the parties involved are now fully committed to each side.
Why has the media been so smug about Qanon?
And who appointed you as Q-whisperer?
Be careful what you wish for, anon.
In that case, I outrank you on the subject and my interpretation is more valid. I do not believe there to be a singular meaning to Q's statement and more represents a general initiation of phases across all aligned actors.