Anonymous ID: ca777e Nov. 1, 2020, 5:23 p.m. No.11399007   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9205

>>11397057 (noted pb) I Believe it is the Maga Lion they care about for tracking. They didn't flip out until IT was removed and aflgb always posts the lion.

 

we are fighting McChrystal's AI along with the fuzzy thinking mouth breathers in /comms, and it would not surprise me if every graphic here gets hashed, analyzed, catalogued, and uploaded to all the lifelog filter systems. drop something here, camoed or not, and they know.

 

retrospectively, wonder if some of the shill attacks whilst baking are due to having altered the same image slightly (months or years ago).

 

what is the source of the original "maga lion" ?

Anonymous ID: ca777e Nov. 1, 2020, 5:29 p.m. No.11399117   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9136 >>9174 >>9242

>>11398231 (noted lb) Speaker Pelosi says that all three Supreme Court justices appointed by Trump should recuse themselves from cases tied to potential election disputes because they have a conflict of interest.

 

here's my election and SC fanfic:

 

  1. dems steal the election with Hammer and Scorecard just like 2012 and (almost) 2016.

 

  1. POTUS continues to say "lets see what happens"

 

  1. SC takes up vote stuff, some may recuse, doesn't matter, just theater

 

  1. meantime, Biden is disqualified, putting Harris up for prez spot

 

  1. SC takes up birthright anchor baby citizenship stuff, for which no SC justices recuse, and set precedents for future, including disqualifying Harris

 

  1. having secured this, POTUS rolls out the voter fraud cases, shows the true count where he won fair and square, gets reinaugurated on schedule.

 

  1. MAGA all over again, plus televised Gitmo.

Anonymous ID: ca777e Nov. 1, 2020, 5:36 p.m. No.11399242   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11399117

furthermore, seems like all the precedents needed to throw out the mail in voting extensions already happened in Gore v. Bush with the hanging chad thing and not creating multiple classes of voters with different privilege. this is why it won't matter if any SC justice recuses on the election issues. If they do.