Anonymous ID: c17726 Nov. 1, 2020, 6:17 p.m. No.11399886   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0076 >>0194 >>0307 >>0387 >>0432

SCOTUS NOVEMBER ARGUMENTS BEGIN TOMORROW

 

19-547 FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE V. SIERRA CLUB, INC.

DECISION BELOW: 925 F.3d 1000

CERT. GRANTED 3/2/2020

QUESTION PRESENTED:

WhetherExemption 5 of the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5) (2012)

by incorporating the [deliberative process privilege], protects against compelled

disclosure a federal agency's draft documents that were prepared as part of a formal

interagency consultation process underSection 7 of the Endangered Species Act of1973, 16 U.S.C. 1536

and that concerned a proposed agency action that was later

modified in the consultation process.

LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 17-16560

+

19-199 SALINAS V. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD

DECISION BELOW: 765 Fed.Appx. 79

CERT. GRANTED 1/10/2020

QUESTION PRESENTED:

Whether, undersection 5(f) of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act, 45 U.S.C. ยง 355(f), and section 8 of the Railroad Retirement Act, 45 U.S.C. ยง 231gthe

Railroad Retirement Board's denial of a request to reopen a prior benefits determination

is a "final decision" subject tojudicial review

LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 18-60702

 

>https://www.supremecourt.gov/

Anonymous ID: c17726 Nov. 1, 2020, 6:39 p.m. No.11400248   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

SCOTUS NOVEMBER ARGUMENTS BEGIN TOMORROW

 

19-547 FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE V. SIERRA CLUB, INC.

DECISION BELOW: 925 F.3d 1000

CERT. GRANTED 3/2/2020

QUESTION PRESENTED:

WhetherExemption 5 of the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5) (2012)

by incorporating the [deliberative process privilege], protects against compelled

disclosure a federal agency's draft documents that were prepared as part of a formal

interagency consultation process underSection 7 of the Endangered Species Act of1973, 16 U.S.C. 1536

and that concerned a proposed agency action that was later

modified in the consultation process.

LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 17-16560

+

19-199 SALINAS V. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD

DECISION BELOW: 765 Fed.Appx. 79

CERT. GRANTED 1/10/2020

QUESTION PRESENTED:

Whether, undersection 5(f) of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act, 45 U.S.C. ยง 355(f), and section 8 of the Railroad Retirement Act, 45 U.S.C. ยง 231gthe

Railroad Retirement Board's denial of a request to reopen a prior benefits determination

is a "final decision" subject tojudicial review

LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 18-60702

 

>https://www.supremecourt.gov/