CONTROL “SCIENCES” an Article by L. Ron Hubbard 15 June 1969
It is not well known to the public that psychiatry and psychology, as taught in schools and lavishly financed by governments, are NOT intended to cure anything. The idea of CURE is the furthest from both the government and scholastic intention.
The idea that a science could be developed to CONTROL populations sprang up to counter the Liberty, Fraternity and Equality demands of the French Revolution. The Comte de Saint-Simon (1760-1825) advocated reorganizing all society. In association with August Comte (1798-1857) the theory was put forward that one could control the entirety of the population by isolating certain principles.
These men were violently opposed to a free society and neither were personally successful in life.
Comte, as a student, was part of the mutiny which destroyed the École Polytechnique, beginning the trend of university mutinies, which extended through the nineteenth century in Europe and Russia and in our own times, everywhere that these totalitarian principles were advocated. At Leipzig University, Ludwig and Wundt were to further this movement by advancing the idea that nerve conditioning could be done.
In Russia, Pavlov conceived the idea that men’s former social responses could be altered and, after the university mutinies, the Communist Totalitarian State was brought into being with psychiatry and psychology in charge in the background.
Using the same principles, German doctors pushed Nazi Totalitarian Germany into existence and extended “conditioning” to mean outright murder of all dissenters.
The Russian Totalitarian State, using its KGB and psychiatric agents, and assisted by the “very best people,” has pushed the British Empire to extermination and is currently working on America.
The pattern is invariable. The questionable joys of the totalitarian state are pushed into the textbooks of schools, called “psychology” or “sociology” and the new generation rises, with trained-in disloyalty and treason to their country.
The “very best people” and the most corruptible politicians are engineered into compliance and voila! As Comte would say, we have our totally controlled society where Liberty, Fraternity and Equality are the nastiest words one can utter.
These harebrained visionaries are listened to by feeble minded politicians and by snobs who actively detest “the mob.” It seems so convincing — a system by which one can CONTROL the entire population by the natural laws these “experts” pretend to know (but which are too learned to possible be communicated).
It is a strange dream wherein everybody likes strawberries, everybody is tame, all is calm. And the very best people sit on a knoll and play a shepherd’s pipe while the sheep quietly graze.
However, it doesn’t work out that way. Mainly because the exponents of the total social state know nothing of the mind, people or government. Any policeman knows more about crime than the most learned “criminal psychiatrist.” Any hospital nurse knows more about the society than the best-trained “sociologist” in the world.
What happens when D-day arrives is a bit more unpleasant. The “very best people” are slaughtered, very painfully. The population, decimated, begins to starve. A violent and cruel secret police has to be active everywhere to continually prevent counterrevolution. A gruesome constant reign of terror crushes the population for decades.
It has never occurred to any of these totalitarians that the whole detestation of Mankind becomes focused upon them in these Totalitarian monstrosities. And when they blow up, they spatter their organizers into fragments.
This half-witted dream to control society for its own sake has so far slaughtered more than a hundred million human beings in this century alone.
I would say that the control philosophies called psychiatry, psychology and sociology were a failure. Probably the biggest human failure of the last two centuries.
Isn’t it time we got rid of them?
By L. Ron Hubbard (Founder of Dianetics & Scientology)
____________
Newfag here.
I know that many of you think the above individual may be controversial, but maybe he has the reputation he does in the media because he was a public figure who WAS ONTO THE DEEP STATE EVEN BACK IN 1969?
Just some food for thought. Let me know what you think