>>11401184 pb
can you prove any of that?
>>11401029 pb
Q is a them, isn't it?
what do you mean? "We gave "him" a platform
?
Anyway, why would the logo be representing the connection to POTUS?
Could the logo really be a "Q proof" or pointing to one?
What could be a Q-proof at first glance?
The hand on the chin gesture of pepe?
is that appropriate for a logo?
Do we want a pastiche for the banner?
Shouldn't we stand alone?
Isn't that moar proper for objective researchers?
do we need to proclaim our connection to POTUS?
>>11401253 pb
>>11401037
What am I missing?
Why is it 'messing with Marines"?
Do they desire the Lion there?
No one is taking out the Marines from the Logo, in fact, making the flag be in color is more respectful
And having less clutter is more respectful
>>11401082 pb
To all the anons who complain this is "messing with the way things were" why are you complaining about the namefag Bakers. Or are you?
The lion makes it "too busy" for me as well as other reasons I don't like it (connects to MAGA group - which is a group pointed out by Q to us as ~hang-outs?)
The Lion is the sign of the House of David
I remebered the cc showing up. The image of it. Earlier, And found the references.
so how to reconile that with the Chinese release?