Anonymous ID: d0cb71 Nov. 1, 2020, 7:42 p.m. No.11401280   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1357 >>1485

>>11401231 lb

Anon was saying we're not "adopting" the lion as symbolism, but I've been posting images of lions on this board prior to its conception, even back on half /pol/. It isn't being adopted and it's not foreign symbolism.

Again, though, I don't care what anyone does or doesn't display in the thumbnail so long as we're all on the same page and don't have breads worth of discussion about it.

 

>>11401232 lb

It seems like you misread. I was indeed being pedantic, but that comment anon made didn't make any senseโ€ฆ

Anonymous ID: d0cb71 Nov. 1, 2020, 8:22 p.m. No.11401879   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1898

>>11401787

As has been explained plenty of times, the paytriot faggots like inthematrix and prayingmedic kept calling themselves and us "Qanons".

I think Q was referring to these mentions in that drop.

I'd been bitching for months correcting everyone that we're simply anons and that there are not "Qanons".

I don't think Q was saying "don't call us Qanon like you've been doing for the past three years", as evidenced by all of the archives where we called Q "Qanon" over and over again, I think Q was pointing out that those stupid paytriot faggots were being retarded and I think part of their angle was to point out that they're newfags who don't represent anons.

 

This "redo everything at the last minute" seems way too ridiculous to me, almost like [they] are trying to get us to waste time and avoid digging or noticing things we should be focused on.

 

I agree that Q is just Q and that anons are just anons, but we can't ignore that anons have long called anons who we suspect are some kind of insider something like HWanon because they claim to be a holywood insider, meganon because they were posting about mega and kim dotcom and adjacent topics or FBIanon because they posted an FBI insignia and claimed they were an agent.

The naming pattern helps us refer to specific people while retaining their anonymity and it also helps us go back and reference certain posts in the archives if we need to.

I wouldn't suspect someone who's new or shilling to recognize this though.

Anonymous ID: d0cb71 Nov. 1, 2020, 8:25 p.m. No.11401919   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1989

>>11401823

I think you're misunderstanding Q's meaning.

We used to call Q "Qanon" for years before you came here.

You're just now arriving, I take it.

We had graphics galore with "Qanon" written on them and we referenced "Qanon" endlessly in different write ups and shit that we've done.

I liked >>11401802 's take.