Anonymous ID: 5b41cd Nov. 2, 2020, 2:37 a.m. No.11405314   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5322 >>5341

>>11405241

Not being deliberately offensive when I say this: It is clear you are somewhat new, relatively speaking, to the Q board and it is clear to those of us that have been here for the extended long term but the vanilla graphic you speak of was chosen after lengthy discussion and actually was legitimately unanimously agreed upon. And it has been under attack at least 6 times now, that I am aware of.

 

Always during a time when focus would have been better on current events. And always nearly the same arguments used to change it. This latest ‘remove the q anon reference’ is a new one but that carries just as little weight.

 

What you saw tonight is not ‘shilling’ or ‘comma’ or any other artificial group attack, arguing to change it back. You saw the long time, early adopters come out of silence and lurking to defend it.

 

The takeaway for all should be this:

 

On here, as in real life, not all crowds of dissenters are inauthentic. And those arguing for the preservation of what came before, against the whimsy of a distinct minority are all too often the ‘real’ people. With the boys and shills the ones pushing loudly and forcefully to change.

Anonymous ID: 5b41cd Nov. 2, 2020, 2:56 a.m. No.11405412   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5424

>>11405341

Show me where Q plainly stated it should be removed - after 3 years of it being there.

 

Q is not vague or unclear in any way when board changes should occur. The attempt to remove it from the graphic ‘is’ the attack.

 

Change the language, change the symbols and you change minds. This is the initial wedge that allows (((them))) the footing for the next attack.

 

So unless Q comes out stating it plainly, leave it alone.

Anonymous ID: 5b41cd Nov. 2, 2020, 3:04 a.m. No.11405466   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5561

>>11405449

That Q does not own qanon.pub is likely true - but we do not know know for sure.

 

We do however know for sure that if/when Q wants something on this board changed Q is 100% clear and does not require decoding.

 

There has been no request - or directive - to remove references to q anon.

 

Prove me wrong